0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Meadowlark_Scal on April 04, 2012, 08:29:29 PMsmall ball with one center maybe..but not full small...when duncan is out there...who would do that...really....Can you argue with the results...it cut 6 points off the lead.
small ball with one center maybe..but not full small...when duncan is out there...who would do that...really....
Quote from: nickagneta on April 04, 2012, 08:33:50 PMQuote from: Meadowlark_Scal on April 04, 2012, 08:29:29 PMsmall ball with one center maybe..but not full small...when duncan is out there...who would do that...really....Can you argue with the results...it cut 6 points off the lead.I would have preferred we went small when KG was on the floor. At least then we would have had a rebounder/rim protector in there. Bass did do a nice job though (except on the boards). Some nice defense on Duncan, a great steal and good rotation speed.
Bradley was terrific in the first half. I'd like to see him start the second half. Use him on Tony Parker to begin with and see if Bradley can slow down this fast tempo.
Garnett finished 1-8 to after being 3-3
Ry needs to be an "off the bench" guy....he is more of a specialist, it was good to have him and peitrus in there....when ray hits a few, and peitrus slashes...it really is good..but ray is maybe a D liability..or close....
Quote from: thestackshow on April 04, 2012, 08:34:34 PMQuote from: Swoopz on April 04, 2012, 08:32:25 PMWhy are people complaining about/blaming Ray? He started, yeah, and hasn't played well, but Avery's played more minutes than him so far so what's the problem?Its because we get off to very slow starts when Ray is starting because our lineup is too slow, old and weaker defensively.Our biggest problem has been getting off to slow starts, with Bradley starting, it fixed that.Now you see what happens when he isnt starting, we have to play catch up because our first half sucked.You're just telling any lie you can to get your point across.We started off old and slow because Ray started...yet we started off with the lead. It was actually in the 5 minute mark when Bradley came in that everything started to go downhill.I'm fine with Bradley starting but you don't need to try to blame Ray for things that have nothing to do with him just to make that point
Quote from: Swoopz on April 04, 2012, 08:32:25 PMWhy are people complaining about/blaming Ray? He started, yeah, and hasn't played well, but Avery's played more minutes than him so far so what's the problem?Its because we get off to very slow starts when Ray is starting because our lineup is too slow, old and weaker defensively.Our biggest problem has been getting off to slow starts, with Bradley starting, it fixed that.Now you see what happens when he isnt starting, we have to play catch up because our first half sucked.
Why are people complaining about/blaming Ray? He started, yeah, and hasn't played well, but Avery's played more minutes than him so far so what's the problem?