Don't really want him to be honest. I don't think he's as good as he's hyped up to be.
Way more picks available who will become better players in the NBA. Austin is going to need a lot of work to be a star in the NBA.
What you see, though, is the flashes where he might be *able* to become a star in the NBA. If you're picking at around #20, you're usually getting guys that - if you pick well - become solid rotation players.
Rondo was a great pick at around that point in the draft because while he had a lot of flaws, you could see that he had the potential to become a star. That's why I don't begrudge Danny taking a chance on Gerald Green at #18; he was a kid who could have become something special. If you're trying to jumpstart a franchise and you aren't picking high enough to get a sure-thing kind of player, you've got to be a little aggressive. We've got to get the team's future leading scorer.
Usually, at that point in the draft, I'm thinking of guys we drafted like Delonte and Avery Bradley and Tony Allen; good players, guys who belong in the rotation, but role players.
Austin Rivers may flame out and never be anything in the NBA. But, his ceiling is pretty [dang] high. If he's available, I think you draft him based on that potential.
Having the two picks helps, too - make one safer pick, and one high-upside gamble.
And, I know Rivers had a disappointing season, I know there are concerns about attitude, and I know he's probably not a point guard. I still think this team can use a Monta Ellis-type going forward; someone who can run with Rondo and just get some points on the board. Bradley will be around to help with the D, and we need to get a good young big man - but Ray's probably gone, and Pierce probably retires in a year. We have some good young players in Rondo and Bradley (and hopefully JJJ proves to be good, too), but there isn't really a *scorer* in the group.