I think alot of fans are blinded to the obvious defficiencies about Rondo and how its really affecting the team. He's not a good fit for the team
The Celtics have been to 2 NBA finals, won a Championship, came within 5 minutes of winning #2, won 4 straight Atlantic Divisions, and have had 50 or more wins for 4 straight years. Rondo has been the PG for all of these seasons.
Let me say first Rondo is an all-star point guard, but not a superstar point guard
If that is a "deficiency," I will take that every time.
When did running become a requirement to winning a championship? If the Big 3 are plodding down the court, but still excecuting and hitting shots, I could care less.
It isn't a requirement. It just happens that the Celtics are at their best in the open court, even now, and are at their worst bogged down in half-court sets.
We shouldn't forget the playoffs are all about how well you do in half court sets. The Lakers in their back to back titles were probably the slowest plodding team ever, and had very little fastbreak points (especially the 2010 team)
The Lakers had 2 Seven-footers who were post scorers, a 6'10" SF and a 6'8" SG, with an old PG to boot. They weren't a running team because they couldn't run. That was their system for their personnel.
The half court play is when Rondo's glaring weaknesses comes to play. He hogs the ball alot.
He is second in the league in assists per game. People typically complain because he doesn't hog the ball
enough.
He stands at the top of the key, dirbbles for 20 seconds and stagnates the offense. His jumphot makes other teams play 4 on 5, and makes Celtics easier to guard in the in the playoffs.
If you want to criticize the offensive strategy, criticize Doc. He designs the plays, Rondo calls them. If Rondo calls a bad game, then its on him.
Rarely does Doc ever say that Rondo called a bad game. It is usually the opposite.
And about his jumpshot - he is shooting better this year from mid-range than at any point in his career, which includes all of those Atlantic Division winning teams with 50 or more wins and multiple trips to the NBA finals. So clearly that is not the cause for the teams struggles.
Rondo has to peform [dang] near perfect for the team to win.
Isn't that a confirmation of just how important he is for this team? Isn't that the fault of his teammates and his coaches?
It gets stressful, as the his teammates have to expend alot of energy and work extra hard to score points. You could make the case that Rondo's passing gives his teammates easy open looks. But if you think about it, if he gets 15 assists that is only 15 plays he completed. All of his other plays are turnovers, holding the ball, shooting 3 pointers with 2 seconds on the shotclock, etc
So if he has another triple double, which he leads the NBA in, does that mean he only completes the plays he has assists on?
I still can't get over the fact that inexperienced point guards in Moore and Bradley, along with Dooling made the Celtics offense run more smoothly that Rondo has this season. Not to say Moor and Bradley are the solution, but it really highlights that Rondo is not a good for this team
The team is better with Moore, Bradley, and Dooling than with Rondo? Have you watched Dooling play this year? I mean of all people...Dooling???
It never ceases to amaze me how much Rondo is underappreciated on this board and by C's fans.