f the Lakers are unwilling to give up Pau + Bynum for Dwight Howard, why give up Pau + Bynum for Dwight + Beasley + Barea? Beasley and Barea isn't enough added value to make that trade worthwhile given the Lakers' position.
Sounds like a load of nonsense to me. I wouldn't take it seriously.
Because Dwight is a franchise-changing big man.
Lakers also, after 2014 will have nothing on the books (besides a re-signed Dwight + other fillers.) By then, they'll have a prime Dwight + plenty of cap space to gobble up another free agent or two. They'll even be decent this year with, still a very good Kobe, (finally!) a PG + Beasley who could do a decent job filling in at PF.
This is a no-brainer for LA. And a good deal for the Wolves giving up crap for Pau.
The team that gets raped, is of course, Orlando. I'm not sold on Williams, he seems like a guy without a position. He cannot play the small forward at all (that's why Wesley Johnson, who is one of the worst players in the league is starting at SF), and as of now, he isn't big enough to be a 4. Plus, with Beasley and Love, Minny has a glut at 4. But that's truly beside the point. Orlando has to, and I mean has to, clear as many of their contracts as they can when they trade Dwight. If they seriously make a trade to swap Dwight with Bynum (and pick up a prospect in Derrick Williams) and try to stay 'competitive' and be a borderline Round 1+2 team; then...wow. If they lose Dwight, if there's ever a team that needs to 'blow it up' it's Orlando. Yes, even more than the Celtics.
They need to start shedding those salaries, and pick up as many draft picks as they possibly can.
But Otis is their GM. A man who makes David Kahn look positively Auerbachian.