Author Topic: Bulls (10-2) at Celtics (4-5) 1/13  (Read 112530 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Bulls (10-2) at Celtics (4-5) 1/13
« Reply #285 on: January 13, 2012, 09:09:45 PM »

Offline mc34

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 540
  • Tommy Points: 40
I'm fine with the chippiness from Rondo. He cares. We need to get Ray more shots too, for the last time....

Re: Bulls (10-2) at Celtics (4-5) 1/13
« Reply #286 on: January 13, 2012, 09:09:58 PM »

Offline GreenFaith1819

  • NCE
  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15402
  • Tommy Points: 2785
Bright spots so far? Ray Ray and Rondo....

Re: Bulls (10-2) at Celtics (4-5) 1/13
« Reply #287 on: January 13, 2012, 09:10:06 PM »

Offline Change

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6666
  • Tommy Points: 544
Perk where are you?

Re: Bulls (10-2) at Celtics (4-5) 1/13
« Reply #288 on: January 13, 2012, 09:10:56 PM »

Offline 33_Larry Legend_33

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 588
  • Tommy Points: 87
I want Doc to send a STRONG message and SIT KG and Pierce the rest of this game... 

Re: Bulls (10-2) at Celtics (4-5) 1/13
« Reply #289 on: January 13, 2012, 09:11:10 PM »

Offline CelticHooligan3

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1073
  • Tommy Points: 130
Perk wouldn't be a difference maker right now, no...but moving him did what for us? What was the point? I would rather him be here. At least there would be someone in the paint that provides some kind of intimidation. Moving Perk did way more harm than good. I'm not gonna say Perk is the reason we are in this position right now because that would just be crazy, but that trade was the catalyst for a lot of bad decisions down the line that led to this. Destroying the team chemistry alone wasn't worth it.

It saved us a lot of money over the next few years and kept our chance at a championship last year alive.

It kept our chance of a championship last year alive? LOL!!! Okay.

And the money it saved us is doing what for us right now? Oh...



Gives us a little thing called HOPE maybe... Idk.

Re: Bulls (10-2) at Celtics (4-5) 1/13
« Reply #290 on: January 13, 2012, 09:11:11 PM »

Offline Casperian

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3501
  • Tommy Points: 545
Perk wouldn't be a difference maker right now, no...but moving him did what for us? What was the point? I would rather him be here. At least there would be someone in the paint that provides some kind of intimidation. Moving Perk did way more harm than good. I'm not gonna say Perk is the reason we are in this position right now because that would just be crazy, but that trade was the catalyst for a lot of bad decisions down the line that led to this. Destroying the team chemistry alone wasn't worth it.

It saved us a lot of money over the next few years and kept our chance at a championship last year alive.

It kept our chance of a championship last year alive? LOL!!! Okay.

And the money it saved us is doing what for us right now? Oh...

The money does as much as Perk would do right now: absolutely nothing.

Perk wouldn´t help us rebuild, though, the money does.

And I´m just explaining the thought process behind the trade here as I see it. People were pretty adamant about not wanting to blow this team up last year, Danny took a calculated risk.

Nothing wrong with that.
In the summer of 2017, I predicted this team would not win a championship for the next 10 years.

3 down, 7 to go.

Re: Bulls (10-2) at Celtics (4-5) 1/13
« Reply #291 on: January 13, 2012, 09:11:45 PM »

Offline YouCantHandleTheTruth!

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 676
  • Tommy Points: 31
I would suggest a trade to the Bulls:

rondo + Kg for Rose..  ;D
The Celtic in me.

Re: Bulls (10-2) at Celtics (4-5) 1/13
« Reply #292 on: January 13, 2012, 09:11:50 PM »

Offline letsgoblue86

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3763
  • Tommy Points: 292
That's a ****ing foul?!

Re: Bulls (10-2) at Celtics (4-5) 1/13
« Reply #293 on: January 13, 2012, 09:11:56 PM »

Online slamtheking

  • NCE
  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32316
  • Tommy Points: 10098
for those saying PP looks like he was counting on the season being cancelled, it's looking more and more like that's the case.  same for KG.  they should have focussed more on conditioning than Edited.  Profanity and masked profanity are against forum rules and may result in discipline.ing about the CBA.

Re: Bulls (10-2) at Celtics (4-5) 1/13
« Reply #294 on: January 13, 2012, 09:12:05 PM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
4-8 here we come.

Re: Bulls (10-2) at Celtics (4-5) 1/13
« Reply #295 on: January 13, 2012, 09:12:40 PM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 52796
  • Tommy Points: 2568
Wow, just noticed all the activity outside of the game thread.

Don't normally see that happen until after the game is over. Says a lot about the mood of the forum.

Re: Bulls (10-2) at Celtics (4-5) 1/13
« Reply #296 on: January 13, 2012, 09:12:57 PM »

Offline TheBig5

  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 386
  • Tommy Points: 25
Perk where are you?

His 6 points 6 rebounds a game would help out our offense tremendously... ::)

Re: Bulls (10-2) at Celtics (4-5) 1/13
« Reply #297 on: January 13, 2012, 09:13:21 PM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32877
  • Tommy Points: 843
  • Larry Bird for President
Danny has failed miserably the last two seasons. Just horrible. This team is beyond repair. Pierce is really disappointing. Shut him.down. just a horrible team. Unacceptable.

Re: Bulls (10-2) at Celtics (4-5) 1/13
« Reply #298 on: January 13, 2012, 09:13:25 PM »

Offline mc34

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 540
  • Tommy Points: 40
The scariest thing is that Rose hasn't even been dominating yet. Even worse, Rondo has actually outplayed Rose and we're still getting wrecked.

Re: Bulls (10-2) at Celtics (4-5) 1/13
« Reply #299 on: January 13, 2012, 09:14:26 PM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 52796
  • Tommy Points: 2568
I don't want to see Bass in the starting lineup.

It should either be Wilcox or Stiemsma if not JO. But not Bass.