Tonights pacers game was just horrible offensively and I am disappointed with pierce for having a bad game, but At this point we all should agree that this is not the big 3's team to carry any more...it's rondo's. However I just can't help but wonder if he is good enough. I love the guy, but I am starting to believe that he is as good as he is from a numbers standpoint because of the attention the big 3 gets.
Rondo just makes so many maadingly frustrating plays that it negates all the good he does over the course of a game. He continually take crazy layups on the break to avoid being fouled but what's worse is that the shots are so contorted that they rarely go in. We were making a run at the end of the third quarter and he pulled the ball up on a fast break and dribbled out the clock and then gave it to kg at the absolute last second rather take it in a and get fouled on the break. The game to game inconsistency another issue and then within each game he completely changes his aggressiveness like in the 4th.
Assist wise, rondo is a top 3 pg in the league, but his lack of shooting effects everything we do offensively. As the big three ages or retires, won't these deficiencies be even more obvious?
Rather than swinging for the fences, would danny be better served trading rondo for a solid shooting point guard who is not quite the disher that rondo is. Someone like Darren collison, raymond felton, Lowry in Houston, even a Brandon jennings or tyreke Evans. Couldn't we get those guys and then some (perhaps a hard working banger) for rondo? Wouldn't any of those guy be soilid starting with the big three and open up our offense?
I think with the big three in their current state and even for the future, it may be time to sell high on rondo.
Am I just frustrated because of our start this season or do others feel this way. I do love rondo though and it kills me to think this way.