Can somebody tell me in what way the Pacers are a worse basketball team than the Celtics?
I'm having trouble thinking of it right now.
Rebounding?  Nope.
Defense?  Nope.
Size?  Nope.
Composure?  Well . . . based on that fourth quarter . . . Nope.
Scoring options?  Naw.
Depth?  Nope.
Somebody help me out here.
Rondo and Pierce are much better than Collison/Granger.  KG's about even with West at his current level of play.  Ray is still a better player than George.  Hibbert's an advantage over JO, but JO eliminates much of his scoring ability.
Bass is a better player than Hansbrough (gets rebounds, but shoots a terrible %).
George Hill is much better than anything we have at back-up guard.  Jeff Foster is better than WIlcox/Stiemsma (although Wilcox is capable of a lot more than he's showing).
No need to overreact.
Edit: Daniels and Dahntay Jones are a wash for me.  Pietrus is better than Jones by a fair margin.