what i dont really get with all the talk i hear about JO is, where exactly do we trade him to?
whilst i agree that he hasn't exactly been exceptional in our first 3 games (first THREE games of a SIXTY SIX game season), he's hardly the only one. it's not like the Cs defensive identity, or scoring ability, rests solely upon his shoulders.
honestly, if i were to single anyone out from what i've seen, it would be KG. he looks old and done. do i think he actually is old and done? no, not at all. well, not done at least, but certainly old

. he'll pick it up, his conditioning will improve, the new guys will mesh more with him, he'll get up to game speed. same with everyone else on the team, you've gotta believe they're gonna improve.
i guess the thing that gets me the most with all the JO complainers is, well, what are you gonna do? "let's trade him and get a better big man! yeah!". um, from where? and who is going to take JO if he looks so bad? if he's as bad as you all say he is, he obviously doesn't have that much to contribute as a player. and with only a $6.2M contract, he's not exactly going to take a massive load off a team, or given them massive amounts of cap space... i guess i just don't see what the appeal is to another team.
really, the best case scenario was the potential david west deal. unfortunately, we're unlikely to find another team being run with the express mandate to lose as much salary as possible/get as many young players as possible. yes, most teams are fairly interested in keeping cap space flexibility, as well as having young talent, but not to the same degree as the hornets were.
probably time to end this rant (in my 2nd post on here... oops

), but it's just frustrating i guess!