i can think of 1 rookie getting PT under doc..that was baby. i highly doubt johnson nor moore get any run..even though I think moore is the best option to back up ray and johnson could stretch the floor from the PF spot
I linked to three rookies. He also gave Pat Burke, Orien Greene, Ryan Gomes, Leon Powe, and Rajon Rondo playing time.
much different situation.
How so? His Orlando teams were trying to win and he played rookies there as well as rookies with the C's both when they were tanking and contending.
Your assertion is false, he has played rookies in the past and there is a reasonable chance JJJ could end up getting 10-13 minutes a game like BBD did. Much depends on how others (Bass, Wilcox, and O'Neal) play and how ready JJJ is, it has nothing to do with Doc's supposed distaste for rookies.
I completely agree with Fafnir here. I've done some stats on Doc's use of rookies before (going way back to his Orlando days) and he definitely does NOT shy away from giving major minutes to rookies when it is appropriate to do so. He is no different than most NBA coaches in this regard.
In general, veteran-dominated playoff contenders almost never have minutes to spare for rookies. Unless there are injuries. Thus last year, Bradley got no playing time but Semih Erden and Luke Harangody did.
Just look at the rosters of all the playoff teams each year and check how many minutes rookies get. Unless a team truly has no alternative, most playoff teams give almost NO minutes to rookies. But if they have no alternative, then yeah, they will.
Also, it IS important to note that not all rookies are created equal. 'Rookies' who come into the league off 4 years of college or one or two years of euro ball or D-league ball may or may not have as much 'upside' as younger draftees. But they _definitely_ tend to be better prepared if they DO get called to action. Again, a case in point here would be Harangody - who of all our rookies last year ended up getting the most minutes. Partly because he ended up on the Cavs - a suck team that was NOT contending, but also partly because he was mature enough that coaches could trust him. He had already gotten quite a few minutes with the Celtics before the trade.
In addition to JJJ and E'tuan, one of our other 'rookies' is the big guy, Stiemsma. He also barely qualifies as a 'rookie' because not only is he a 4-year college boy (Wisconsin) he also has logged a couple of D-league seasons. So all 3 of our 'rooks' this year are a little older and more developed than normal. ALL are much older than Bradley, who is just barely passed legal drinking age!
Bradley was drafted purely on future potential. I'm pretty sure Doc & Danny never had any misconceptions that he was going to be able to do much last year to help out. He was just plain way too young. It was a value pick. Consider that if Bradley had stayed in college, he likely would have posted much bigger stats - similar to the way he dominated the D-league - and would have been drafted much higher than Danny got him for.
As Fafnir points out, our thinness at the 5 and the desire to keep KG fresh through what could be a grueling season will likely create opportunities for both JJJ and Stiemsma to get some decent minutes.