Author Topic: Celtics looking at Shannon Brown  (Read 4102 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Celtics looking at Shannon Brown
« on: December 01, 2011, 04:53:59 PM »

Offline WeMadeIt17

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3397
  • Tommy Points: 435
Was over at Redsarmy and saw that on the front page they are saying that the Celtics are interested in Shannon Brown. Would love to see him in a Celtics uni. What do you think?

Re: Celtics looking at Shannon Brown
« Reply #1 on: December 01, 2011, 04:56:14 PM »

Offline PosImpos

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12383
  • Tommy Points: 903
  • Rondo = Good
I doubt we could get him for anything less than the $3 million MLE, which we're probably going to want to spend on a big man, considering our utter lack of depth there.

Brown might be better than Delonte, but I'd prefer to stick with Delonte, considering we can probably get him for a minimum deal.
Never forget the Champs of '08, or the gutsy warriors of '10.

"I know you all wanna win, but you gotta do it TOGETHER!"
- Doc Rivers

Re: Celtics looking at Shannon Brown
« Reply #2 on: December 01, 2011, 04:57:40 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
I doubt we could get him for anything less than the $3 million MLE, which we're probably going to want to spend on a big man, considering our utter lack of depth there.
You really think he'll get that much money?

Maybe, he's very athletic but his play was always so up and down....

Re: Celtics looking at Shannon Brown
« Reply #3 on: December 01, 2011, 05:02:53 PM »

Online Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 53114
  • Tommy Points: 2574
Yuck

Re: Celtics looking at Shannon Brown
« Reply #4 on: December 01, 2011, 05:05:28 PM »

Offline Kane3387

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8269
  • Tommy Points: 944
  • Intensity!!!
I doubt we could get him for anything less than the $3 million MLE, which we're probably going to want to spend on a big man, considering our utter lack of depth there.
You really think he'll get that much money?

Maybe, he's very athletic but his play was always so up and down....

He will get more then the vet minimum which is all we could offer him unless we do the mini mle. No thanks.


KG: "Dude.... What is up with yo shorts?!"

CBD_2016 Cavs Remaining Picks - 14.14

Re: Celtics looking at Shannon Brown
« Reply #5 on: December 01, 2011, 05:08:45 PM »

Offline LooseCannon

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11833
  • Tommy Points: 950
I doubt we could get him for anything less than the $3 million MLE, which we're probably going to want to spend on a big man, considering our utter lack of depth there.
You really think he'll get that much money?

Maybe, he's very athletic but his play was always so up and down....

That describes a lot of players who received big contracts that they didn't live up to.
"The worst thing that ever happened in sports was sports radio, and the internet is sports radio on steroids with lower IQs.” -- Brian Burke, former Toronto Maple Leafs senior adviser, at the 2013 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference

Re: Celtics looking at Shannon Brown
« Reply #6 on: December 01, 2011, 05:14:33 PM »

Online Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 53114
  • Tommy Points: 2574
Tweener guard who is too small to play the two and too dumb to play the point.

As a two guard, S.Brown is a poor defender/rebounder. Unfortunately, he is also a below average offensive player (51.8% TS% last two years and no added value as a passer or ball-handler) so he can't make up for his defensive shortcomings on that end of the floor either.

As a PG, Brown is an above average defender/rebounder but has a poor handle + is a non-passer who lacks the composure and decision making necessary to run an offense + is still an inefficient and largely ineffective scorer.

Inconsistent and lacks talent. Not a rotation player in this league. Third string level talent who will command $3mil per annum on a multi-year deal. No interest.

Re: Celtics looking at Shannon Brown
« Reply #7 on: December 01, 2011, 05:15:18 PM »

Offline Greenbean

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3739
  • Tommy Points: 418
Very intriguing but not for 3 mil...


He would be our new Tony Allen. (Not as dynamic defensively)


Re: Celtics looking at Shannon Brown
« Reply #8 on: December 01, 2011, 05:16:36 PM »

Offline Greenbean

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3739
  • Tommy Points: 418


Tweener guard who is too small to play the two and too dumb to play the point.

As a two guard, S.Brown is a poor defender/rebounder. Unfortunately, he is also a below average offensive player (51.8% TS% last two years and no added value as a passer or ball-handler) so he can't make up for his defensive shortcomings on that end of the floor either.

As a PG, Brown is an above average defender/rebounder but has a poor handle + is a non-passer who lacks the composure and decision making necessary to run an offense + is still an inefficient and largely ineffective scorer.

Inconsistent and lacks talent. Not a rotation player in this league. Third string level talent who will command $3mil per annum on a multi-year deal. No interest.

He was a rotation player...on a chamionship team.

Re: Celtics looking at Shannon Brown
« Reply #9 on: December 01, 2011, 05:18:09 PM »

Online Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 53114
  • Tommy Points: 2574


Tweener guard who is too small to play the two and too dumb to play the point.

As a two guard, S.Brown is a poor defender/rebounder. Unfortunately, he is also a below average offensive player (51.8% TS% last two years and no added value as a passer or ball-handler) so he can't make up for his defensive shortcomings on that end of the floor either.

As a PG, Brown is an above average defender/rebounder but has a poor handle + is a non-passer who lacks the composure and decision making necessary to run an offense + is still an inefficient and largely ineffective scorer.

Inconsistent and lacks talent. Not a rotation player in this league. Third string level talent who will command $3mil per annum on a multi-year deal. No interest.

He was a rotation player...on a chamionship team.
A bad one. Ineffective.

Re: Celtics looking at Shannon Brown
« Reply #10 on: December 01, 2011, 05:18:19 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330


Tweener guard who is too small to play the two and too dumb to play the point.

As a two guard, S.Brown is a poor defender/rebounder. Unfortunately, he is also a below average offensive player (51.8% TS% last two years and no added value as a passer or ball-handler) so he can't make up for his defensive shortcomings on that end of the floor either.

As a PG, Brown is an above average defender/rebounder but has a poor handle + is a non-passer who lacks the composure and decision making necessary to run an offense + is still an inefficient and largely ineffective scorer.

Inconsistent and lacks talent. Not a rotation player in this league. Third string level talent who will command $3mil per annum on a multi-year deal. No interest.

He was a rotation player...on a chamionship team.
Jordan Farmar, Sasha Vujachic, Eddie House, Sam Cassell, Brian Cardinal, Glen Davis as a rookie, etc....

Being a rotation player on a championship team means you were on a good team, not that you were a good player.

Re: Celtics looking at Shannon Brown
« Reply #11 on: December 01, 2011, 05:20:42 PM »

Offline Greenbean

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3739
  • Tommy Points: 418


Tweener guard who is too small to play the two and too dumb to play the point.

As a two guard, S.Brown is a poor defender/rebounder. Unfortunately, he is also a below average offensive player (51.8% TS% last two years and no added value as a passer or ball-handler) so he can't make up for his defensive shortcomings on that end of the floor either.

As a PG, Brown is an above average defender/rebounder but has a poor handle + is a non-passer who lacks the composure and decision making necessary to run an offense + is still an inefficient and largely ineffective scorer.

Inconsistent and lacks talent. Not a rotation player in this league. Third string level talent who will command $3mil per annum on a multi-year deal. No interest.

He was a rotation player...on a chamionship team.
Jordan Farmar, Sasha Vujachic, Eddie House, Sam Cassell, Brian Cardinal, Glen Davis as a rookie, etc....

Being a rotation player on a championship team means you were on a good team, not that you were a good player.

None of those guys were in the rotation during the finals of the championship teams.

Brown averaged close to 14 mpg in the finals against the Celtics.

Im not saying this guy deserves 3mil but if we could get him for cheap I would rather have him than Marquis Daniels...in a heartbeat.

Re: Celtics looking at Shannon Brown
« Reply #12 on: December 01, 2011, 05:25:43 PM »

Offline Liam W

  • Joe Mazzulla
  • Posts: 145
  • Tommy Points: 13
Not happening.

We cant afford Shannon Brown. Maybe if Ainge traded KG's mammoth $21million then maybe we got a shot

But untill then. Not gona happen

And i heard the Lakers were wanting to bring him back also


Re: Celtics looking at Shannon Brown
« Reply #13 on: December 01, 2011, 05:31:32 PM »

Offline Celts Fan 92

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1423
  • Tommy Points: 122
man wat??! naw bring back delonte better defender nd not as inconsistant as Brown

Re: Celtics looking at Shannon Brown
« Reply #14 on: December 01, 2011, 06:00:40 PM »

Offline Shots

  • Brad Stevens
  • Posts: 223
  • Tommy Points: 39
Isn't Shannon Brown essentially Nate Robinson, just a few inches taller? I think we've seen what a Nate type player could add to this team, and somehow, I think the management is looking for something different.

I sincerely hope they're retaining Delonte, rather than taking a significant risk for a player with a lot of flash, but not more. If (and it is a pretty big if) Delonte can stay healthy for say, 80% of the games, I don't see why he couldn't be a contender for 6th man of the year. Playing time behind Rondo and Allen should be ample.