My gut tells me that the entire season will be missed. I feel 100% confident that the owners are dedicated to fixing the system, and feel like they cannot give in like they did last time to a system that does not make sense financially (in their opinion).
And at the same time, I think the players, for whatever reason, do not believe that the owners are serious. I think the players are preparing to play chicken, and I don't think they are going to realize that they can't win this until it is past the point of return for next season.
If the players are that dumb, then why won't the lockout go on to the season after that? Either they give in so they can play, or they commit to fighting, depends on which they care about more.
I find it hard to believe that the players will just suddenly realize the state of affairs AFTER they've already given up their season.
I agree and I have to think that the overseas market for players might be enough to sustain enough players through the lockout for this to possibly be looking at a second lost season whereby then I think it will be the owners that crash.
See, this is something I don't buy for 1 reason. I don't think the players are going to be forced back to the table because they are broke. I think that is just a few cases that are overblown.
However, what I do think is going to happen is that these guys are going to see their careers shortened, and that is going to scare them.
Even if they are making some money in Europe, the majority of them are not going to be making nearly as much as they would make in the NBA, even under the current low-ball offer by the owners. And even more importantly for a lot of the players, they are losing important years where they could be building their legacy...and for what?
At some point these players are going to look at it and realize that they are losing much more money by holding out longer than they would be by just giving in. Sure, future generations might not be making as much money as if the players took the owners to the cleaners, but as these guys miss more games and paychecks, that stuff is going to be wiped out when they realize they are losing their present for someone else's future.
I don't buy the whole,"the players will be worry about their legacy" bit. First off, how many players have a legacy? The top 1-2% of the best players ever? Maybe?
I mean are Nicolas Batum, Ersan Ilyasova, Nenad Krstic, Leandro Barbosa, Ron Artest, Patty Mills, Jordan Farmer, Sasha Vujacic, Sonny Weems, Von Wafer, Ty Lawson, David Anderson, Timofey Movgov, Andrei Kirilenko, etc. the type of players that are or should be worrying about their legacy?
Also, if Deron Williams and a few other stars show that you can make millions overseas playing(though not as much) while signing new and different endorsement contracts and growing their "brand" overseas, it could open newer markets and perhaps lead to other stars seeing the benefit in playing overseas during the lockout.
I think this bares watching. I think this could be a huge factor when you consider markets in Europe, Brazil, and Asia suddenly opening up to local teams selling Williams, Kobe, Wade or LeBron or Bosh paraphernalia in something other than "NBA Brand" gear. Especially if the players are getting a direct cut of those sales.