Author Topic: The Nuclear Option: Moving Rondo and Pierce  (Read 21242 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: The Nuclear Option: Moving Rondo and Pierce
« Reply #15 on: July 15, 2011, 03:57:05 PM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123
The following assumes similar CBA
------------------------------------
Pierce and Rondo to LAC
Kamen, Gordon, Bledsoe, Aminu, Min #1 to BOS

The Clippers are instant favorites in the West. Rondo-Whoever-Pierce-Griffin-Jordan with Williams-Foye-Gomes of the bench is a sick team.

Boston's 2011-2012 offseason contract commitment: $12 million

That is enough cap to offer three $14 million deals. Chris Paul, Kevin Love and Dwight Howard.

Paul - Gordon - Aminu - Love - Howard

Bledsoe, Bradley and the kids from Purdue do not make the most impressive bench, but add some vet minimum guys AND A TOP 5 DRAFT PICK...

Lets also not rule out the posibility of KG and Ray coming back for one or two more rings on tiny contracts...

  What if you don't sign the three max contract players? then you've traded PP and Rondo for a chance to be the TWolves or the Kings.

  Plus, won't DH and CP get more than $14M? They both make more than that now. They'd probably combine for $33M or so in the first year of their deals.

Well, from a pure value standpoint, I actually think that package is an absolute steal for the C's, even if they don't get those free agents...which is why I don't think the Clippers touch it.

You get a potentially high lottery pick in a loaded draft, a guy who looked like a star in the making (Gordon), a quality center on an expiring contract, and 2 highly thought of prospects.

That is a TON to give up for an aging star and a second tier PG.  

While it certainly would be taking a step back for the C's, that deal would put them in tremendous position to rebuild on the fly, whether it is with Howard and Paul or not.  

But again, even the Clippers would never consider it.  

  If the Clippers think Rondo is a second tier pg then they'd never consider it. If they see him as one of the top pgs in the league like many others do they'd have a different take on the situation. You give up a shot at the title for Kaman, a player who's not as good as Rondo, a couple of decent prospects and a draft pick. it closes our window without giving us a great future.

Re: The Nuclear Option: Moving Rondo and Pierce
« Reply #16 on: July 15, 2011, 04:00:45 PM »

Offline Michael Anthony

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 874
  • Tommy Points: 117
The following assumes similar CBA
------------------------------------
Pierce and Rondo to LAC
Kamen, Gordon, Bledsoe, Aminu, Min #1 to BOS

The Clippers are instant favorites in the West. Rondo-Whoever-Pierce-Griffin-Jordan with Williams-Foye-Gomes of the bench is a sick team.

Boston's 2011-2012 offseason contract commitment: $12 million

That is enough cap to offer three $14 million deals. Chris Paul, Kevin Love and Dwight Howard.

Paul - Gordon - Aminu - Love - Howard

Bledsoe, Bradley and the kids from Purdue do not make the most impressive bench, but add some vet minimum guys AND A TOP 5 DRAFT PICK...

Lets also not rule out the posibility of KG and Ray coming back for one or two more rings on tiny contracts...

  What if you don't sign the three max contract players? then you've traded PP and Rondo for a chance to be the TWolves or the Kings.

  Plus, won't DH and CP get more than $14M? They both make more than that now. They'd probably combine for $33M or so in the first year of their deals.

Well, from a pure value standpoint, I actually think that package is an absolute steal for the C's, even if they don't get those free agents...which is why I don't think the Clippers touch it.

You get a potentially high lottery pick in a loaded draft, a guy who looked like a star in the making (Gordon), a quality center on an expiring contract, and 2 highly thought of prospects.

That is a TON to give up for an aging star and a second tier PG.  

While it certainly would be taking a step back for the C's, that deal would put them in tremendous position to rebuild on the fly, whether it is with Howard and Paul or not.  

But again, even the Clippers would never consider it.  
exactly, now if the Min #1 wasn't included you might see LA at least think about it and I'd still probably do that trade.

Yeah, I think that would be much more reasonable.  Of course it makes it tougher to swallow for the C's, and it would probably come down to what they think of Aminu and Bledsoe (who Danny was high on before he was drafted), but it would certainly be an interesting "blow it up" option though. 

You guys are making a lot of sense.

The pick is really valuable because it is our only garaunteed asset - Bledsoe and Aminu could regress, Gordon could walk, and the free agents could go elsewhere.

I would be willing to conceed our two first rounders, Green, Davis or a future first. I would even let them put Top 2 protection on it.
"All I have to know is, he's my coach, and I follow his lead. He didn't have to say anything in here this week. We all knew what we had to do. He's a big part of our family, and we're like his extended family. And we did what good families do when one of their own is affected." - Teddy Bruschi

Re: The Nuclear Option: Moving Rondo and Pierce
« Reply #17 on: July 15, 2011, 04:01:53 PM »

Offline Michael Anthony

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 874
  • Tommy Points: 117
The following assumes similar CBA
------------------------------------
Pierce and Rondo to LAC
Kamen, Gordon, Bledsoe, Aminu, Min #1 to BOS

The Clippers are instant favorites in the West. Rondo-Whoever-Pierce-Griffin-Jordan with Williams-Foye-Gomes of the bench is a sick team.

Boston's 2011-2012 offseason contract commitment: $12 million

That is enough cap to offer three $14 million deals. Chris Paul, Kevin Love and Dwight Howard.

Paul - Gordon - Aminu - Love - Howard

Bledsoe, Bradley and the kids from Purdue do not make the most impressive bench, but add some vet minimum guys AND A TOP 5 DRAFT PICK...

Lets also not rule out the posibility of KG and Ray coming back for one or two more rings on tiny contracts...

  What if you don't sign the three max contract players? then you've traded PP and Rondo for a chance to be the TWolves or the Kings.

  Plus, won't DH and CP get more than $14M? They both make more than that now. They'd probably combine for $33M or so in the first year of their deals.

Well, from a pure value standpoint, I actually think that package is an absolute steal for the C's, even if they don't get those free agents...which is why I don't think the Clippers touch it.

You get a potentially high lottery pick in a loaded draft, a guy who looked like a star in the making (Gordon), a quality center on an expiring contract, and 2 highly thought of prospects.

That is a TON to give up for an aging star and a second tier PG.  

While it certainly would be taking a step back for the C's, that deal would put them in tremendous position to rebuild on the fly, whether it is with Howard and Paul or not.  

But again, even the Clippers would never consider it.  

  If the Clippers think Rondo is a second tier pg then they'd never consider it. If they see him as one of the top pgs in the league like many others do they'd have a different take on the situation. You give up a shot at the title for Kaman, a player who's not as good as Rondo, a couple of decent prospects and a draft pick. it closes our window without giving us a great future.


You forgot cap space, a huge asset in this league. Exhibit A: Miami Heat
"All I have to know is, he's my coach, and I follow his lead. He didn't have to say anything in here this week. We all knew what we had to do. He's a big part of our family, and we're like his extended family. And we did what good families do when one of their own is affected." - Teddy Bruschi

Re: The Nuclear Option: Moving Rondo and Pierce
« Reply #18 on: July 15, 2011, 04:05:55 PM »

Offline TheTruthFot18

  • NCE
  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2125
  • Tommy Points: 263
  • Truth Juice
Love it. But as someone said Love doesnt fit for a number of obvious reasons. He dominates the boards in minny because his starting center is Darko, not DHoward. I'd rather have alower scoring/rebounding pf who could at least play some D and get some steals or blocks in here or there. Otherwise This is one of the best blow it all up trades.
The Nets will finish with the worst record and the Celtics will end up with the 4th pick.

- Me (sometime in January)

--------------------------------------------------------

Guess I was wrong (May 23rd)

Re: The Nuclear Option: Moving Rondo and Pierce
« Reply #19 on: July 15, 2011, 04:10:04 PM »

Offline Casperian

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3501
  • Tommy Points: 545
I would be willing to conceed our two first rounders, Green, Davis or a future first. I would even let them put Top 2 protection on it.

We still have the 2012 Clippers´ first.

I would love to see Eric Gordon in green.
In the summer of 2017, I predicted this team would not win a championship for the next 10 years.

3 down, 7 to go.

Re: The Nuclear Option: Moving Rondo and Pierce
« Reply #20 on: July 15, 2011, 04:44:10 PM »

Offline Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34680
  • Tommy Points: 1603
The following assumes similar CBA
------------------------------------
Pierce and Rondo to LAC
Kamen, Gordon, Bledsoe, Aminu, Min #1 to BOS

The Clippers are instant favorites in the West. Rondo-Whoever-Pierce-Griffin-Jordan with Williams-Foye-Gomes of the bench is a sick team.

Boston's 2011-2012 offseason contract commitment: $12 million

That is enough cap to offer three $14 million deals. Chris Paul, Kevin Love and Dwight Howard.

Paul - Gordon - Aminu - Love - Howard

Bledsoe, Bradley and the kids from Purdue do not make the most impressive bench, but add some vet minimum guys AND A TOP 5 DRAFT PICK...

Lets also not rule out the posibility of KG and Ray coming back for one or two more rings on tiny contracts...

  What if you don't sign the three max contract players? then you've traded PP and Rondo for a chance to be the TWolves or the Kings.

  Plus, won't DH and CP get more than $14M? They both make more than that now. They'd probably combine for $33M or so in the first year of their deals.

Well, from a pure value standpoint, I actually think that package is an absolute steal for the C's, even if they don't get those free agents...which is why I don't think the Clippers touch it.

You get a potentially high lottery pick in a loaded draft, a guy who looked like a star in the making (Gordon), a quality center on an expiring contract, and 2 highly thought of prospects.

That is a TON to give up for an aging star and a second tier PG.  

While it certainly would be taking a step back for the C's, that deal would put them in tremendous position to rebuild on the fly, whether it is with Howard and Paul or not.  

But again, even the Clippers would never consider it.  
exactly, now if the Min #1 wasn't included you might see LA at least think about it and I'd still probably do that trade.

Yeah, I think that would be much more reasonable.  Of course it makes it tougher to swallow for the C's, and it would probably come down to what they think of Aminu and Bledsoe (who Danny was high on before he was drafted), but it would certainly be an interesting "blow it up" option though.  
Honestly I don't think it is that much of a "blow it up" option as I think that team is still very much in the mix in the East.

I think we could also tweak the trade to provide more depth.  For example, we can just take on Mo Williams without sending anything else back (and something LA would probably be fine with).  Mo isn't an all star but he provides some solid veteran leadership and can still play (he does add an extra year of salary though).  He is a good player to bridge the gap before just handing it over to Bledsoe.  The Clippers also have Ryan Gomes who we could bring back as a bench player to provide some wing depth (rather then Williams).

That would leave the C's with the following rotation

Williams/Bledsoe/West
Gordon/Allen/Bradley/West
Green/Aminu/Daniels
Garnett/JO/Davis/Johnson
Kaman/JO

I'm assuming Moore doesn't make the team which leaves an open roster spot for a center.  I also wouldn't be surprised if Daniels or West is let go, opening up another spot.
2025 Historical Draft - Cleveland Cavaliers - 1st pick

Starters - Luka, JB, Lebron, Wemby, Shaq
Rotation - D. Daniels, Mitchell, G. Wallace, Melo, Noah
Deep Bench - Korver, Turner

Re: The Nuclear Option: Moving Rondo and Pierce
« Reply #21 on: July 15, 2011, 04:50:38 PM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123
The following assumes similar CBA
------------------------------------
Pierce and Rondo to LAC
Kamen, Gordon, Bledsoe, Aminu, Min #1 to BOS

The Clippers are instant favorites in the West. Rondo-Whoever-Pierce-Griffin-Jordan with Williams-Foye-Gomes of the bench is a sick team.

Boston's 2011-2012 offseason contract commitment: $12 million

That is enough cap to offer three $14 million deals. Chris Paul, Kevin Love and Dwight Howard.

Paul - Gordon - Aminu - Love - Howard

Bledsoe, Bradley and the kids from Purdue do not make the most impressive bench, but add some vet minimum guys AND A TOP 5 DRAFT PICK...

Lets also not rule out the posibility of KG and Ray coming back for one or two more rings on tiny contracts...

  What if you don't sign the three max contract players? then you've traded PP and Rondo for a chance to be the TWolves or the Kings.

  Plus, won't DH and CP get more than $14M? They both make more than that now. They'd probably combine for $33M or so in the first year of their deals.

Well, from a pure value standpoint, I actually think that package is an absolute steal for the C's, even if they don't get those free agents...which is why I don't think the Clippers touch it.

You get a potentially high lottery pick in a loaded draft, a guy who looked like a star in the making (Gordon), a quality center on an expiring contract, and 2 highly thought of prospects.

That is a TON to give up for an aging star and a second tier PG.  

While it certainly would be taking a step back for the C's, that deal would put them in tremendous position to rebuild on the fly, whether it is with Howard and Paul or not.  

But again, even the Clippers would never consider it.  

  If the Clippers think Rondo is a second tier pg then they'd never consider it. If they see him as one of the top pgs in the league like many others do they'd have a different take on the situation. You give up a shot at the title for Kaman, a player who's not as good as Rondo, a couple of decent prospects and a draft pick. it closes our window without giving us a great future.


You forgot cap space, a huge asset in this league. Exhibit A: Miami Heat

  Exhibit B: the 5-6 teams with cap space that *didn't* get LeBron.

Re: The Nuclear Option: Moving Rondo and Pierce
« Reply #22 on: July 15, 2011, 04:59:57 PM »

Offline Eja117

  • NCE
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19274
  • Tommy Points: 1254
All I know is nuclear weapons are an important part of the US arsenal and nuclear energy is an indispensable part of the US energy mix

Re: The Nuclear Option: Moving Rondo and Pierce
« Reply #23 on: July 15, 2011, 07:57:07 PM »

Offline Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34680
  • Tommy Points: 1603
The following assumes similar CBA
------------------------------------
Pierce and Rondo to LAC
Kamen, Gordon, Bledsoe, Aminu, Min #1 to BOS

The Clippers are instant favorites in the West. Rondo-Whoever-Pierce-Griffin-Jordan with Williams-Foye-Gomes of the bench is a sick team.

Boston's 2011-2012 offseason contract commitment: $12 million

That is enough cap to offer three $14 million deals. Chris Paul, Kevin Love and Dwight Howard.

Paul - Gordon - Aminu - Love - Howard

Bledsoe, Bradley and the kids from Purdue do not make the most impressive bench, but add some vet minimum guys AND A TOP 5 DRAFT PICK...

Lets also not rule out the posibility of KG and Ray coming back for one or two more rings on tiny contracts...

  What if you don't sign the three max contract players? then you've traded PP and Rondo for a chance to be the TWolves or the Kings.

  Plus, won't DH and CP get more than $14M? They both make more than that now. They'd probably combine for $33M or so in the first year of their deals.

Well, from a pure value standpoint, I actually think that package is an absolute steal for the C's, even if they don't get those free agents...which is why I don't think the Clippers touch it.

You get a potentially high lottery pick in a loaded draft, a guy who looked like a star in the making (Gordon), a quality center on an expiring contract, and 2 highly thought of prospects.

That is a TON to give up for an aging star and a second tier PG.  

While it certainly would be taking a step back for the C's, that deal would put them in tremendous position to rebuild on the fly, whether it is with Howard and Paul or not.  

But again, even the Clippers would never consider it.  

  If the Clippers think Rondo is a second tier pg then they'd never consider it. If they see him as one of the top pgs in the league like many others do they'd have a different take on the situation. You give up a shot at the title for Kaman, a player who's not as good as Rondo, a couple of decent prospects and a draft pick. it closes our window without giving us a great future.


You forgot cap space, a huge asset in this league. Exhibit A: Miami Heat

  Exhibit B: the 5-6 teams with cap space that *didn't* get LeBron.

well the Knicks got Amare and the Bulls got Boozer.  Not exactly a terrible usage of cap space (though Boozer is looking more debateable).
2025 Historical Draft - Cleveland Cavaliers - 1st pick

Starters - Luka, JB, Lebron, Wemby, Shaq
Rotation - D. Daniels, Mitchell, G. Wallace, Melo, Noah
Deep Bench - Korver, Turner

Re: The Nuclear Option: Moving Rondo and Pierce
« Reply #24 on: July 15, 2011, 08:09:45 PM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123
The following assumes similar CBA
------------------------------------
Pierce and Rondo to LAC
Kamen, Gordon, Bledsoe, Aminu, Min #1 to BOS

The Clippers are instant favorites in the West. Rondo-Whoever-Pierce-Griffin-Jordan with Williams-Foye-Gomes of the bench is a sick team.

Boston's 2011-2012 offseason contract commitment: $12 million

That is enough cap to offer three $14 million deals. Chris Paul, Kevin Love and Dwight Howard.

Paul - Gordon - Aminu - Love - Howard

Bledsoe, Bradley and the kids from Purdue do not make the most impressive bench, but add some vet minimum guys AND A TOP 5 DRAFT PICK...

Lets also not rule out the posibility of KG and Ray coming back for one or two more rings on tiny contracts...

  What if you don't sign the three max contract players? then you've traded PP and Rondo for a chance to be the TWolves or the Kings.

  Plus, won't DH and CP get more than $14M? They both make more than that now. They'd probably combine for $33M or so in the first year of their deals.

Well, from a pure value standpoint, I actually think that package is an absolute steal for the C's, even if they don't get those free agents...which is why I don't think the Clippers touch it.

You get a potentially high lottery pick in a loaded draft, a guy who looked like a star in the making (Gordon), a quality center on an expiring contract, and 2 highly thought of prospects.

That is a TON to give up for an aging star and a second tier PG.  

While it certainly would be taking a step back for the C's, that deal would put them in tremendous position to rebuild on the fly, whether it is with Howard and Paul or not.  

But again, even the Clippers would never consider it.  

  If the Clippers think Rondo is a second tier pg then they'd never consider it. If they see him as one of the top pgs in the league like many others do they'd have a different take on the situation. You give up a shot at the title for Kaman, a player who's not as good as Rondo, a couple of decent prospects and a draft pick. it closes our window without giving us a great future.


You forgot cap space, a huge asset in this league. Exhibit A: Miami Heat

  Exhibit B: the 5-6 teams with cap space that *didn't* get LeBron.

well the Knicks got Amare and the Bulls got Boozer.  Not exactly a terrible usage of cap space (though Boozer is looking more debateable).

  So you'd give up another shot at the title for Eric Gordon, a draft pick and a Boozer-level player?

Re: The Nuclear Option: Moving Rondo and Pierce
« Reply #25 on: July 15, 2011, 08:28:25 PM »

Offline jdz101

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3171
  • Tommy Points: 404
Lol where is the Celtics identity without R2P2? All the millions of kids with rondo jerseys just gotta wait for someone new?? I would find it very hard to follow the Celtics after this trade.


how much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck was chris bosh?

Re: The Nuclear Option: Moving Rondo and Pierce
« Reply #26 on: July 15, 2011, 08:57:27 PM »

Offline BASS_THUMPER

  • Scal's #1 Fan
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11472
  • Tommy Points: 5352
  • Thumper of the BASS!
no no no

i need to see one more run with a solid center who can run the whole season..

this team needs one more chance like biggie

"firsts things first i poppa..."

Re: The Nuclear Option: Moving Rondo and Pierce
« Reply #27 on: July 15, 2011, 09:33:57 PM »

Offline Edgar

  • Kevin McHale
  • ************************
  • Posts: 24646
  • Tommy Points: 445
  • No contaban con mi astucia !!!
or the clippers keep their players ( i am no sure about the ontracts but shouldnt be that big)
and finally make their own young contender with
griffin,gordon,jordan and some other young star
pray  for kaman
use the money to get a vet pg ala Miller style and a decent SF or at least a liable defensive vet
like prince or even redd or one who keeps healthy at least
and dominate the west
I see this closer to happend

unless we are talking about clips and they screw all


Once a CrotorNat always a CROTORNAT  2 times CB draft Champion 2009-2012

Nice to be back!

Re: The Nuclear Option: Moving Rondo and Pierce
« Reply #28 on: July 16, 2011, 08:46:59 AM »

Offline Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34680
  • Tommy Points: 1603
The following assumes similar CBA
------------------------------------
Pierce and Rondo to LAC
Kamen, Gordon, Bledsoe, Aminu, Min #1 to BOS

The Clippers are instant favorites in the West. Rondo-Whoever-Pierce-Griffin-Jordan with Williams-Foye-Gomes of the bench is a sick team.

Boston's 2011-2012 offseason contract commitment: $12 million

That is enough cap to offer three $14 million deals. Chris Paul, Kevin Love and Dwight Howard.

Paul - Gordon - Aminu - Love - Howard

Bledsoe, Bradley and the kids from Purdue do not make the most impressive bench, but add some vet minimum guys AND A TOP 5 DRAFT PICK...

Lets also not rule out the posibility of KG and Ray coming back for one or two more rings on tiny contracts...

  What if you don't sign the three max contract players? then you've traded PP and Rondo for a chance to be the TWolves or the Kings.

  Plus, won't DH and CP get more than $14M? They both make more than that now. They'd probably combine for $33M or so in the first year of their deals.

Well, from a pure value standpoint, I actually think that package is an absolute steal for the C's, even if they don't get those free agents...which is why I don't think the Clippers touch it.

You get a potentially high lottery pick in a loaded draft, a guy who looked like a star in the making (Gordon), a quality center on an expiring contract, and 2 highly thought of prospects.

That is a TON to give up for an aging star and a second tier PG.  

While it certainly would be taking a step back for the C's, that deal would put them in tremendous position to rebuild on the fly, whether it is with Howard and Paul or not.  

But again, even the Clippers would never consider it.  

  If the Clippers think Rondo is a second tier pg then they'd never consider it. If they see him as one of the top pgs in the league like many others do they'd have a different take on the situation. You give up a shot at the title for Kaman, a player who's not as good as Rondo, a couple of decent prospects and a draft pick. it closes our window without giving us a great future.


You forgot cap space, a huge asset in this league. Exhibit A: Miami Heat

  Exhibit B: the 5-6 teams with cap space that *didn't* get LeBron.

well the Knicks got Amare and the Bulls got Boozer.  Not exactly a terrible usage of cap space (though Boozer is looking more debateable).

  So you'd give up another shot at the title for Eric Gordon, a draft pick and a Boozer-level player?

The Celtics are not winning the title next year without making moves. 
2025 Historical Draft - Cleveland Cavaliers - 1st pick

Starters - Luka, JB, Lebron, Wemby, Shaq
Rotation - D. Daniels, Mitchell, G. Wallace, Melo, Noah
Deep Bench - Korver, Turner

Re: The Nuclear Option: Moving Rondo and Pierce
« Reply #29 on: July 16, 2011, 10:49:35 AM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123
The following assumes similar CBA
------------------------------------
Pierce and Rondo to LAC
Kamen, Gordon, Bledsoe, Aminu, Min #1 to BOS

The Clippers are instant favorites in the West. Rondo-Whoever-Pierce-Griffin-Jordan with Williams-Foye-Gomes of the bench is a sick team.

Boston's 2011-2012 offseason contract commitment: $12 million

That is enough cap to offer three $14 million deals. Chris Paul, Kevin Love and Dwight Howard.

Paul - Gordon - Aminu - Love - Howard

Bledsoe, Bradley and the kids from Purdue do not make the most impressive bench, but add some vet minimum guys AND A TOP 5 DRAFT PICK...

Lets also not rule out the posibility of KG and Ray coming back for one or two more rings on tiny contracts...

  What if you don't sign the three max contract players? then you've traded PP and Rondo for a chance to be the TWolves or the Kings.

  Plus, won't DH and CP get more than $14M? They both make more than that now. They'd probably combine for $33M or so in the first year of their deals.

Well, from a pure value standpoint, I actually think that package is an absolute steal for the C's, even if they don't get those free agents...which is why I don't think the Clippers touch it.

You get a potentially high lottery pick in a loaded draft, a guy who looked like a star in the making (Gordon), a quality center on an expiring contract, and 2 highly thought of prospects.

That is a TON to give up for an aging star and a second tier PG.  

While it certainly would be taking a step back for the C's, that deal would put them in tremendous position to rebuild on the fly, whether it is with Howard and Paul or not.  

But again, even the Clippers would never consider it.  

  If the Clippers think Rondo is a second tier pg then they'd never consider it. If they see him as one of the top pgs in the league like many others do they'd have a different take on the situation. You give up a shot at the title for Kaman, a player who's not as good as Rondo, a couple of decent prospects and a draft pick. it closes our window without giving us a great future.


You forgot cap space, a huge asset in this league. Exhibit A: Miami Heat

  Exhibit B: the 5-6 teams with cap space that *didn't* get LeBron.

well the Knicks got Amare and the Bulls got Boozer.  Not exactly a terrible usage of cap space (though Boozer is looking more debateable).

  So you'd give up another shot at the title for Eric Gordon, a draft pick and a Boozer-level player?

The Celtics are not winning the title next year without making moves. 

  Obviously they'll make some moves. Do you expect them to enter the season with no changes to our current roster?