2011 CelticsBlog Draft Board

[jgod213]

Edgar, think you forgot a duo on your 'scoring threat' post:

Deron/Monta:  44.1 ppg
Curry/Martin: 42.0 ppg



LA Conspiracy will gladly give you an extra 2 points there in exchange for a combo who won't be staring daggers at eachother for 48 minutes per game  

[wdleehi]

The Wiz Bullets.



Best team no one is talking about. 


42.3 points a game.

And a big man that can play (because he has successfully) both PF and C.


 

[Rondo2287]

The Wiz Bullets.



Best team no one is talking about. 


42.3 points a game.

And a big man that can play (because he has successfully) both PF and C.


 

And both key contributers to teams that finished a combined 6 games over .500

[jgod213]

The Wiz Bullets.



Best team no one is talking about. 


42.3 points a game.

And a big man that can play (because he has successfully) both PF and C.


 

I have no doubt this team will cause damage in the playoffs.  I'm a big danny granger fan and i think the real life pacers are in a great position this year.  If they could just find one more star to put next to him they would be scary.

[wdleehi]

The Wiz Bullets.



Best team no one is talking about. 


42.3 points a game.

And a big man that can play (because he has successfully) both PF and C.


 

And both key contributers to teams that finished a combined 6 games over .500

One of them lost the other key contributor for the rest of his career.  (still a sad thing for the NBA)

The other, well, he had OK players around him. 


Neither had the talent next to them that they would have together.

[Rondo2287]

The Wiz Bullets.



Best team no one is talking about. 


42.3 points a game.

And a big man that can play (because he has successfully) both PF and C.


 

And both key contributers to teams that finished a combined 6 games over .500

One of them lost the other key contributor for the rest of his career.  (still a sad thing for the NBA)

The other, well, he had OK players around him. 


Neither had the talent next to them that they would have together.

I see a guy that doesnt rebound as well as he should based on his size and a stat hanger for a bad team. But maybe thats just me

[Evantime34]

The Wiz Bullets.



Best team no one is talking about. 


42.3 points a game.

And a big man that can play (because he has successfully) both PF and C.


 

And both key contributers to teams that finished a combined 6 games over .500

One of them lost the other key contributor for the rest of his career.  (still a sad thing for the NBA)

The other, well, he had OK players around him. 


Neither had the talent next to them that they would have together.

I see a guy that doesnt rebound as well as he should based on his size and a stat hanger for a bad team. But maybe thats just me

Maybe I'm confused are you talking about Aldridge?

If this is the case I could not disagree more. He shoots a pretty high percentage (which to me indicates he's not just a stat hanger on a bad team because he is scoring on good shots even with the defense focused on him), and plays good defense.

[Rondo2287]

The Wiz Bullets.



Best team no one is talking about. 


42.3 points a game.

And a big man that can play (because he has successfully) both PF and C.


 

And both key contributers to teams that finished a combined 6 games over .500

One of them lost the other key contributor for the rest of his career.  (still a sad thing for the NBA)

The other, well, he had OK players around him. 


Neither had the talent next to them that they would have together.

I see a guy that doesnt rebound as well as he should based on his size and a stat hanger for a bad team. But maybe thats just me

Maybe I'm confused are you talking about Aldridge?

If this is the case I could not disagree more. He shoots a pretty high percentage (which to me indicates he's not just a stat hanger on a bad team because he is scoring on good shots even with the defense focused on him), and plays good defense.

Sorry I think LA doesnt rebound as well as he should based on his size and athleticism and it has always bugged me


and I think Granger is a stat hanger on a bad team

[Kwhit10]

The Wiz Bullets.



Best team no one is talking about. 


42.3 points a game.

And a big man that can play (because he has successfully) both PF and C.


 

And both key contributers to teams that finished a combined 6 games over .500

One of them lost the other key contributor for the rest of his career.  (still a sad thing for the NBA)

The other, well, he had OK players around him. 


Neither had the talent next to them that they would have together.

I see a guy that doesnt rebound as well as he should based on his size and a stat hanger for a bad team. But maybe thats just me

Maybe I'm confused are you talking about Aldridge?

If this is the case I could not disagree more. He shoots a pretty high percentage (which to me indicates he's not just a stat hanger on a bad team because he is scoring on good shots even with the defense focused on him), and plays good defense.

Sorry I think LA doesnt rebound as well as he should based on his size and athleticism and it has always bugged me


and I think Granger is a stat hanger on a bad team

LA is a good player but his rebounding is bad

Compare LA to a player that hasn't even been drafted yet

LA: 21.8 pts 50%FG 77%FT 8.7RB 1BLK 1STL
XX: 18.9 pts 51%FG 81%FT 7.5RB 1BLK 1STL

[ChampKind]

Looking to break into the top 5 this round, and I'm offering 3(12) and a swap of later round picks to get there. Drop back a little bit today and move up a lot tomorrow!

[zerophase]

The Wiz Bullets.



Best team no one is talking about. 


42.3 points a game.

And a big man that can play (because he has successfully) both PF and C.


 

And both key contributers to teams that finished a combined 6 games over .500

One of them lost the other key contributor for the rest of his career.  (still a sad thing for the NBA)

The other, well, he had OK players around him. 


Neither had the talent next to them that they would have together.

I see a guy that doesnt rebound as well as he should based on his size and a stat hanger for a bad team. But maybe thats just me

Maybe I'm confused are you talking about Aldridge?

If this is the case I could not disagree more. He shoots a pretty high percentage (which to me indicates he's not just a stat hanger on a bad team because he is scoring on good shots even with the defense focused on him), and plays good defense.

Sorry I think LA doesnt rebound as well as he should based on his size and athleticism and it has always bugged me


and I think Granger is a stat hanger on a bad team

I always have mixed feelings about Granger. In my opinion he's just a solid, good player- like a David West or something. But I started to think he had real star potential when he made the all-star team last year and averaged 26ppg? Then he regressed again this year.

[Who]

Willing to trade down from 3.7 if anyone is looking to move up.

[Kwhit10]

With the 1st pick in the 3rd round of the 2011 CB Draft

The Denver Nuggets select Nene Hilario.

[Rondo2287]

With the 1st pick in the 3rd round of the 2011 CB Draft

The Denver Nuggets select Nene Hilario.

Very nice pick, I think he was the only guy deserving consideration of the first pick

[jgod213]

With the 1st pick in the 3rd round of the 2011 CB Draft

The Denver Nuggets select Nene Hilario.

GOSH DARN IT!!!

that's a dynamic front court you got goin there, KW.