I know this thread is a joke... but the thing is... beyond Miami's big 3, I don't think anyone on that team would even crack the Celtic's rotation. Maybe Haslem.
Give them a year, the MLE, LLE and some title chasing vets and that team will be scary.
LeBron took a team to the finals that had Larry Hughes as the 2nd best player... Drew Gooden and Sasha Pavlovic as starters. That was pretty impressive.
There are different approaches to team building. The old model was to get one or two great players and surround them with specialists with one or two great skills that complement the stars. Examples of specialists include Bruce Bowen. The team that best shows this philosophy, in my opinion, was the Sixers team that went to the finals. They had iverson - the best (volume) scorer in the league at the time - and surrounded him specialist/role players. Ratliff/Motumbo for rebounding and defense. Eric Snow to play point on offense but guard the 2 on D (and hide Iverson's defensive weaknesses) and Aaron McKie to hit threes on the drive and kick and play D.
This model is changing, likely because the league has more talent. Dallas' team has less specialists and more ball players than last generations' teams. They use ball movement and a team approach to create offense without a second "superstar." Instead of having all defenders to account for Dirk's weaknesses in that area, they make up for it in all around good players. The Thunder, anohter up-and-coming team, is similar in construction.
With those thoughts in mind, Cleveland with LBJ was built like an old team - specailists and limited players to make LBJ more effective. Miami is not built the same way. But there is still only one basketball. LBJ is so good he should lead a team. He cannot be paired with Wade and reach his potential.
He relegated himself as the greatest second banana of all time. I really dislike his "Decision" both for him and for the league.