Firstly, an above all, it makes me sad. He's been everything you could want a player to be, on and off the court, since coming to Boston. Why would you want to get rid of that?
Secondly, it makes little sense to me. The prevailing wisdom is the Celtics need more shooting/scoring, especially from the backup 2, so you trade your all-star starting 2? How does that help at all?
Thirdly, and this is something I've seen little mentioned: Boston doesn't have the best rep for attracting free agents. I know for the most part there haven't been major guys who we've had cap room for when they've been available, but I think we've occasionally swung and missed at a few MLE's we wanted. With that said, how do you think we're ever going to get a top free agent here if we trade Ray Allen for a draft pick a month after he picks up his option to stay here, after resigning here last year, and having one of the best years of his career? He's one of the most respected players in the NBA, and that would (or should) give any future free agent pause before signing here. (This also goes for trade Paul Pierce discussions, although thankfully I've seen less of those lately.)
That's all. Please recommence with S&T's for Baby discussions.