Author Topic: If 1 of Big 3 traded, it has to be Ray (sadly)  (Read 5644 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

If 1 of Big 3 traded, it has to be Ray (sadly)
« on: May 19, 2011, 11:28:30 AM »

Offline Rondoholic

  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 379
  • Tommy Points: 21
I love Ray, but the fact of the matter remains is that his skill set (stretching the floor) is the easiest piece to replace and upgrade with youth.  With that said, I think the #1 thing we need this offseason is a explosive scorer off the bench.  And no, I don't mean a Von Wafer/Nate Robinson experiment for small money.  We need a guy who has proven he can put up points in bunches.  Despite their reputations, I think we need to target J.R. Smith or O.J. Mayo - Smith a FA, and Mayo was on the block just this past deadline.  A couple ideas I have:

S&T Ray and Baby and future pick for Smith and Kenyon Martin (both FA's I believe)

S&T Ray and future pick for Mayo and Darrell Arthur.

I would then re-sign Delonte and Green and even Krstic.
If Shaq comes back, great.  If JO comes back, ok.
If JO retires, we'll have MLE I believe. 
I'd take a chance on Oden or Yao for a portion of the MLE.

Two possibilities:
C  Krstic, possibly Shaq, JO (or Oden/Yao)
PF Garnett, Martin, JO, this year's 1st
SF Pierce, Green
SG Delonte, Smith
PG Rondo, Delonte, Bradley

C  Krstic, possibly Shaq, JO (or Oden/Yao)
PF Garnett, Arthur, possibly Baby
SF Pierce, Green
SG Mayo, Delonte
PG Rondo, Delonte, Bradley
+ this year's 1st

Re: If 1 of Big 3 traded, it has to be Ray (sadly)
« Reply #1 on: May 19, 2011, 12:00:19 PM »

Offline slam

  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 325
  • Tommy Points: 22
Don't we have the MLE regardless of what JO does?  Isn't that something that is available every year?
Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the number of moments that take your breath away.

Re: If 1 of Big 3 traded, it has to be Ray (sadly)
« Reply #2 on: May 19, 2011, 12:03:25 PM »

Offline Bahku

  • CB HOF Editor
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19771
  • Tommy Points: 3632
  • Oe ma krr pamtseotu
I agree he is the most expendable ... that's why none of them should be traded, (or Rondo).
2010 PAPOUG, 2012 & 2017 PAPTYG CHAMP, HD BOT

* BAHKU MUSIC *

Re: If 1 of Big 3 traded, it has to be Ray (sadly)
« Reply #3 on: May 19, 2011, 12:03:35 PM »

Offline Rondoholic

  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 379
  • Tommy Points: 21
Not sure.  I thought we had it again because Rasheed retired.

Re: If 1 of Big 3 traded, it has to be Ray (sadly)
« Reply #4 on: May 19, 2011, 12:03:48 PM »

Offline Chris

  • Global Moderator
  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18008
  • Tommy Points: 642
Don't we have the MLE regardless of what JO does?  Isn't that something that is available every year?

Well, no one really knows, since it will be under the new CBA.  But if they keep that in the new CBA, then yes, it is something available every year to teams above the cap.

Re: If 1 of Big 3 traded, it has to be Ray (sadly)
« Reply #5 on: May 19, 2011, 12:04:24 PM »

Offline Brendan

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2990
  • Tommy Points: 72
Don't we have the MLE regardless of what JO does?  Isn't that something that is available every year?
This is not knowable until the new CBA is in place.

Re: If 1 of Big 3 traded, it has to be Ray (sadly)
« Reply #6 on: May 19, 2011, 12:05:30 PM »

Offline Rondoholic

  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 379
  • Tommy Points: 21
I agree he is the most expendable ... that's why none of them should be traded, (or Rondo).

Why not get younger and more explosive if he is expendable, as you say, then?

Re: If 1 of Big 3 traded, it has to be Ray (sadly)
« Reply #7 on: May 19, 2011, 12:07:51 PM »

Offline Brendan

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2990
  • Tommy Points: 72
I love Ray, but the fact of the matter remains is that his skill set (stretching the floor) is the easiest piece to replace and upgrade with youth.  With that said, I think the #1 thing we need this offseason is a explosive scorer off the bench.  And no, I don't mean a Von Wafer/Nate Robinson experiment for small money.  We need a guy who has proven he can put up points in bunches.  Despite their reputations, I think we need to target J.R. Smith or O.J. Mayo - Smith a FA, and Mayo was on the block just this past deadline.  A couple ideas I have:

S&T Ray and Baby and future pick for Smith and Kenyon Martin (both FA's I believe)

S&T Ray and future pick for Mayo and Darrell Arthur.

I would then re-sign Delonte and Green and even Krstic.
If Shaq comes back, great.  If JO comes back, ok.
If JO retires, we'll have MLE I believe.  
I'd take a chance on Oden or Yao for a portion of the MLE.

Two possibilities:
C  Krstic, possibly Shaq, JO (or Oden/Yao)
PF Garnett, Martin, JO, this year's 1st
SF Pierce, Green
SG Delonte, Smith
PG Rondo, Delonte, Bradley

C  Krstic, possibly Shaq, JO (or Oden/Yao)
PF Garnett, Arthur, possibly Baby
SF Pierce, Green
SG Mayo, Delonte
PG Rondo, Delonte, Bradley
+ this year's 1st
I agree trading Ray is the most palatable. In a salary dump he could even be a FA and come back for MLE, but I'm sure a team like Chicago would go after him HARD.

I think Shaq = done. I think JO comes back as long as we are going for it. So I'd be fine with a trade for Allen and Baby that brought back a starting caliber SG and another big if the team gets better. I'm also fine playing KG at C.

So something like KG/JO/Kristic at C if you can bring back a really good PF and sign a decent reserve guy. Opens up your options from just looking at Centers.

JR Smith is probably an ideal guy talentwise if losing Ray, I expect CHI to chase him if they can. But I'm not sold on Kenyon as being good enough to warrant the move. I just don't enough know about OJ and Arthur to say if that's enough talent.

Re: If 1 of Big 3 traded, it has to be Ray (sadly)
« Reply #8 on: May 19, 2011, 12:18:24 PM »

Offline Bahku

  • CB HOF Editor
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19771
  • Tommy Points: 3632
  • Oe ma krr pamtseotu
I agree he is the most expendable ... that's why none of them should be traded, (or Rondo).

Why not get younger and more explosive if he is expendable, as you say, then?

I guess I gave the wrong impression ... what I should have said is that Ray is the least vital of the Big Three, but I don't think any of them are expendable. IMHO there are five players we need to hang on to: Paul, Ray, KG, Rondo, and Delonte, everyone else is expendable to a certain degree, depending on what we get in return. That's my opinion.
2010 PAPOUG, 2012 & 2017 PAPTYG CHAMP, HD BOT

* BAHKU MUSIC *

Re: If 1 of Big 3 traded, it has to be Ray (sadly)
« Reply #9 on: May 19, 2011, 12:25:28 PM »

Offline JSD

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12590
  • Tommy Points: 2159
Ray + cap space in 2012 is more valuable than anything you'd get for him in a trade.

Re: If 1 of Big 3 traded, it has to be Ray (sadly)
« Reply #10 on: May 20, 2011, 10:44:51 AM »

Offline Rondoholic

  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 379
  • Tommy Points: 21
Ray + cap space in 2012 is more valuable than anything you'd get for him in a trade.

If cap number shrinks in new CBA, there might not be the cap space that it seems there will be when Ray expires.  I'd take the young talent, while we still get some back especially if we could get two important pieces for the cap number Ray is playing for.

Re: If 1 of Big 3 traded, it has to be Ray (sadly)
« Reply #11 on: May 21, 2011, 12:40:43 PM »

Offline mc34

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 540
  • Tommy Points: 40
I would do Ray and pick for Mayo and Arthur in a heartbeat, but I feel like that's really one-sided in our favor

Re: If 1 of Big 3 traded, it has to be Ray (sadly)
« Reply #12 on: May 21, 2011, 01:13:36 PM »

Offline mgent

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7567
  • Tommy Points: 1962
I don't see any scenario where we can get a better player than any of the Big 3 (ESPECIALLY a better shooter than Ray).

Nevermind a player that fits together as perfectly as they do now.

You don't trade a championship team anyway.  You didn't learn the lesson with Perk?
Philly:

Anderson Varejao    Tiago Splitter    Matt Bonner
David West    Kenyon Martin    Brad Miller
Andre Iguodala    Josh Childress    Marquis Daniels
Dwyane Wade    Leandro Barbosa
Kirk Hinrich    Toney Douglas   + the legendary Kevin McHale

Re: If 1 of Big 3 traded, it has to be Ray (sadly)
« Reply #13 on: May 21, 2011, 01:27:55 PM »

Offline Surferdad

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15238
  • Tommy Points: 1034
  • "He fiddles...and diddles..."
I agree he is the most expendable ... that's why none of them should be traded, (or Rondo).

Why not get younger and more explosive if he is expendable, as you say, then?

I guess I gave the wrong impression ... what I should have said is that Ray is the least vital of the Big Three, but I don't think any of them are expendable. IMHO there are five players we need to hang on to: Paul, Ray, KG, Rondo, and Delonte, everyone else is expendable to a certain degree, depending on what we get in return. That's my opinion.

TP for you.

Re: If 1 of Big 3 traded, it has to be Ray (sadly)
« Reply #14 on: May 21, 2011, 02:46:49 PM »

Offline paulcowens

  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 365
  • Tommy Points: 79
I'm not eager to trade any of the Big Four, at all, but I'm least enamored of Ray Ray.   It seemed to me that Allen's shooting became a lot worse after he broke Miller's record for threes.  I also didn't like the way he tried to arrange things so that he broke the record at the Garden.  I'm just not sure he's as unselfishly team-oriented as he comes off as being.