I just think it is interesting how well Cleveland did in BOTHtheir picks is itluck or something else? NBA already has a bad rep.
This isn't a particularly accurate assessment and it speaks to Roy's point about understanding how the process works.
As Roy notes, the lottery itself consists of only the first three picks, and the rest of the draft order is determined by record just as the odds are. This prevents any team from falling more than three spots down from where their record dictates they would pick if the draft were done strictly by reversal of the standings.
By rule, the worst-case scenario for Minnesota, Cleveland and Toronto (the teams with the three worst record in the league in 2010-11) would have been to select fourth, fifth and sixth respectively.
Cleveland got remarkably lucky with the pick acquired from the Clippers that won the lottery, yes. But as far as "how well Cleveland did in BOTH their picks" [emphasis yours], the only possibility that would have been worse for the Cavaliers' other selection would have been fifth.
I don't say that to suggest that Cavs fans should gripe about selecting first and fourth but in demonstration of the premise that conspiracy intimations are a bit silly.
-sw