Bleacher Report. Yikes.
Are you suggesting that the Chris Paul does have a meniscus in his knee? Cuz if you are, you are wrong.
Easy, buddy. I'm stating that I genuinely don't enjoy the writing going on Bleacher Report. Particularly when they're referencing injuries from over fifteen years ago.
"Easy buddy?" how is that contributing in any way to this thread? Focus on the content not the personalities.
It's contributing by asking you not to be so oddly confrontational and then quickly explaining why I didn't like the link that you provided.
Again, I generally don't like the writing going on there and didn't care for that article. I'm not disputing that Chris Paul has had some issues with his knee, I'm disputing the validity of reading the article.
The article wasn't very good, but the basic point of: Chris Paul doesn't have part of his meniscus in his left knee, (or just one of the two menisci), eventually that grinding will likely end in further complications, possibly micro-fracture surgery or other treatments will become needed.
And that's hardly breaking news...nor would it be much of a deterrent for me if the opportunity came up to acquire Paul.
The point of the post wasn't to discuss whether people like Bleacher report.
If I referenced the national inquirer, we wouldn't be talking about whether or not aliens really were making Paris Hilton clones, we'd be talking about why the national enquirer stunk.
The Bleacher Report (because of the very low level of accountability with author vetting+quality of material coming out) is the equivalent of a sports tabloid.
EDIT: Ugh, and their stupid slide shows, and poorly structured articles jeez! I hate bleacher report.