Chicago have secured the 1st seed, and with the recent spanking of the Celtics things aren't looking too great in Boston. However all is not lost.
Current standings as of 4/9/11:
Boston W 55 L 24
Miami W 55 L 24
As you can see, both are tied but Boston holds the tiebreaker because of a 3-0 series advantage thus far.
What is more interesting though (and very unexpected)...
Boston W 55 L 24
LA Lakers W 55 L 24
Celtics are also tied with the Lakers, season series is tied at 1-1.
Upcoming schedule for all teams:
BOS: BOS @ MIA, BOS @ WAS, NYK @ BOS
MIA: BOS @ MIA, MIA @ ATL, MIA @ TOR
LAL: OKC @ LAL, SAS @ LAL, LAL @ SAC
The Lakers were bulldozing through their schedule but they've stumbled recently with a 4 loss streak. The Boston vs Miami game Sunday will likely decide who gets the no.2 seed in the East.
Boston now has an excellent chance to get HCA over both Miami AND the Lakers if they get to the finals. There are no guarantees that both the Celtics and Lakers make it to the finals, but wouldn't Boston be that much better off with the peace of mind of knowing they have HCA over all the Western teams except SA?
So the question for you all is:
a) Should Doc and the Celtics go all out in the last 3 games, risking increased fatigue, and hoping that LAL loses at least 1 more game to get a potential HCA advantage?
b) Or because the Celtics are so old (they are, let's face it), will they stumble again or choose to cruise to the playoffs, choosing health over homecourt for the rest of the playoffs past round 1.
I personally hope A is the answer obviously, but perhaps my green colored glasses are clouding my judgement.
Your thoughts?