Author Topic: Celtics (50-21) at Timberwolves (17-56) 3/27  (Read 83458 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (50-21) at Timberwolves (17-56) 3/27
« Reply #240 on: March 27, 2011, 09:04:14 PM »

Offline YouCantHandleTheTruth!

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 676
  • Tommy Points: 31
Th truth is that this team has no energy and legs for 48 minutes anymore.
The Celtic in me.

Re: Celtics (50-21) at Timberwolves (17-56) 3/27
« Reply #241 on: March 27, 2011, 09:04:40 PM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32877
  • Tommy Points: 843
  • Larry Bird for President
i finally give in...the trade has been a disaster and will cost us a chance at any title

Re: Celtics (50-21) at Timberwolves (17-56) 3/27
« Reply #242 on: March 27, 2011, 09:04:52 PM »

Offline Megatron

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1586
  • Tommy Points: 136
Will the Celtics EVER be able to beat a team where the enemy is missing their best player?

Man, I hope all playoff teams are fully healthy, if anyone is injured on the opposing team we are gonna get swept.

That's the key to beating the celtics. If we face miami in the playoffs, the Heat should bench Lebron and say that he's injured. We will get swept.

Pretty much.

Lakers without Kobe would probably blow the C's out by 30 every game and sweep them in 4 games.

Re: Celtics (50-21) at Timberwolves (17-56) 3/27
« Reply #243 on: March 27, 2011, 09:05:04 PM »

Offline Tai

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2230
  • Tommy Points: 32
It seems like this slump is bigger than one person, or just the perkins trade, or any one injury.  It is almost like clockwork once we get a lead we get complacent and are practically expecting to lose our lead.  It is hard to see after how badly the team has played in the last few weeks that they can just turn it on in the playoffs.  I believe they need to turn things around NOW, not later.

Probably true, and well said.  Welcome to the blog, and TP.

That said, I continue to blame the Perkins trade; Danny felt the need to test the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" mantra, and it's biting us.

I find it interesting we can even have big leads like we did last season. And then, we blow them like we did last season. And that's all based on the trade?

If we lost in the 1st round, maybe I'll agree. Otherwise, it feels like a copout at this point.

Re: Celtics (50-21) at Timberwolves (17-56) 3/27
« Reply #244 on: March 27, 2011, 09:05:08 PM »

Offline get_banners

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1848
  • Tommy Points: 100
good lord...another miss by pierce. please, bench him. maybe he needs a game off to refocus or something, because he has been pretty awful for a while now.

Re: Celtics (50-21) at Timberwolves (17-56) 3/27
« Reply #245 on: March 27, 2011, 09:05:18 PM »

Online Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 62686
  • Tommy Points: -25472
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
It seems like this slump is bigger than one person, or just the perkins trade, or any one injury.  It is almost like clockwork once we get a lead we get complacent and are practically expecting to lose our lead.  It is hard to see after how badly the team has played in the last few weeks that they can just turn it on in the playoffs.  I believe they need to turn things around NOW, not later.

Probably true, and well said.  Welcome to the blog, and TP.

That said, I continue to blame the Perkins trade; Danny felt the need to test the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" mantra, and it's biting us.

Roy, you're forgetting that top 10 "protected" pick we got from the Clippers...all the money we saved by trading Perk...and we got a terrific offensive Center. How can you ignore all that? Danny got away with highway robbery...there is warrant out for his arrest in OKC.

Well, at least OKC sucks with Perk.  Oh, wait...

That said, Captain for 3!


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER——— AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!@ 34 minutes

Re: Celtics (50-21) at Timberwolves (17-56) 3/27
« Reply #246 on: March 27, 2011, 09:05:39 PM »

Offline jaser

  • The Green Kornet
  • Posts: 99
  • Tommy Points: 18
Age has finally caught up to the Celtics lol.

Dang, Charles was right, their legs wouldnt hold up. They just hit the old age wall, teams full of elderly role-players and a #21 pick point guard that cant shoot. This sucks.

Wow, no Rondo bashing in this post???  ::)

Re: Celtics (50-21) at Timberwolves (17-56) 3/27
« Reply #247 on: March 27, 2011, 09:05:48 PM »

Offline Megatron

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1586
  • Tommy Points: 136
I knew the last two games were guaranteed losses once I saw that Stephen Jackson and Kevin Love were sitting out with injuries.

Re: Celtics (50-21) at Timberwolves (17-56) 3/27
« Reply #248 on: March 27, 2011, 09:06:13 PM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32877
  • Tommy Points: 843
  • Larry Bird for President
wow...getting outworked without love in there

Re: Celtics (50-21) at Timberwolves (17-56) 3/27
« Reply #249 on: March 27, 2011, 09:06:33 PM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
Pierce has taken 7 threes.  :o

Re: Celtics (50-21) at Timberwolves (17-56) 3/27
« Reply #250 on: March 27, 2011, 09:06:43 PM »

Online Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 62686
  • Tommy Points: -25472
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
It seems like this slump is bigger than one person, or just the perkins trade, or any one injury.  It is almost like clockwork once we get a lead we get complacent and are practically expecting to lose our lead.  It is hard to see after how badly the team has played in the last few weeks that they can just turn it on in the playoffs.  I believe they need to turn things around NOW, not later.

Probably true, and well said.  Welcome to the blog, and TP.

That said, I continue to blame the Perkins trade; Danny felt the need to test the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" mantra, and it's biting us.

I find it interesting we can even have big leads like we did last season. And then, we blow them like we did last season. And that's all based on the trade?

If we lost in the 1st round, maybe I'll agree. Otherwise, it feels like a copout at this point.

Hey, I'm just saying it seems weird that we weren't playing like this pre-trade, and we are post-trade.  It could be a massive coincidence, but since a lot of folks predicted this post trade (although probably not to this extent), I'm saying there's at least some correlation.


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER——— AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!@ 34 minutes

Re: Celtics (50-21) at Timberwolves (17-56) 3/27
« Reply #251 on: March 27, 2011, 09:06:54 PM »

Offline GreenFaith1819

  • NCE
  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15402
  • Tommy Points: 2785
Well...so far plenty of blame to spread around...Ray, Paul and Glen are 12 for 37?

Re: Celtics (50-21) at Timberwolves (17-56) 3/27
« Reply #252 on: March 27, 2011, 09:07:13 PM »

Offline YouCantHandleTheTruth!

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 676
  • Tommy Points: 31
younger guys jumping higher..  ::)
The Celtic in me.

Re: Celtics (50-21) at Timberwolves (17-56) 3/27
« Reply #253 on: March 27, 2011, 09:07:39 PM »

Offline LilRip

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6987
  • Tommy Points: 411
yeeesh, Kevin Love making life hell for us on the boards.

oh wait..
- LilRip

Re: Celtics (50-21) at Timberwolves (17-56) 3/27
« Reply #254 on: March 27, 2011, 09:07:43 PM »

Offline Megatron

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1586
  • Tommy Points: 136
Perkins fault we blew a 25 point lead?

Whats clear is that the reason why this team is sucking has little to do with the trade.

Blowing a 25 point lead? How can we blame that on the Perkins trade.