Our losing coincides with Shaq being out... not Perk. People are confused. The 2010-11 Celtics are the story of Shaq at center... Perkins just made a cameo.
Couldn't have said it better
TP
Yep. The story of a 39-year-old guy who just got a cortisone shot, is wearing a walking boot, and who in the last 5-10 games before going out with his injury was a human foul machine who could barely get above the rim to dunk the ball. I love Shaq, but depending on a 39-year-old, heavy guy with all of the mileage he has on those legs is one, huge risk. HUGE.
Shaq and JO in the rotation sharing minutes was better than anything Perk ever done. And you know that deep inside...
In a perfect world? Sure, why not. In a perfect world we'd have Shaq and JO close to 100% and Perk being gone would just be kind of sad. Our bench would be better and it be a sure thing to the championship.
In a perfect world the Celtics wouldn't have lost to the Bobcats at home. WHen the cats didn't have their best player.
In a perfect world Doc wouldn't have blasted his players in a way I've not seen in years.
But this is the real world. And here in the real world Shaq is hurt. Sure Danny thought he'd be fine by this time. But he was wrong. And now we could pay for that big time.