PP and KG both played huge minutes, the sample size for "when they are off the floor" is extremely small.
If you want to find the info I would love to look at it, but for the Twolves it was year after year where they were between 10 and 17th in def efficiency
Also in the 06-07 season we know that the celtics with PP were one of the worst teams ever to lace them up. They were a team with a 10% winning percentage and with him they were almost 500.
KG had better talent on most all of his Twolves teams then PP had. Toine was the best player PP ever played with and He his terrible. He took more shots then points scored in two entire playoff runs! And he couldnt guard anyone.
I would take Sprewell, Cassel and a healthy Wally ahead of anyone Paul played with.
Garnett missed 6 games in 2007. The Wolves went 0 - 6, with an average loss margin of 19.2 points.
On the year, the Wolves were +13 in the roughly 3000 minutes he played, and -310 in the 1000 minutes he sat. Sample size wasn't an issue...the 2007 Wolves were really, REALLY bad outside of Garnett. I mean, like historically bad.
The '07 Celtics were terrible without Pierce...-5.9 points/48 minutes without their Captain.
The '07 Wolves were even worse without KG... -14.8 points/48 minutes without Garnett.
I don't see why this needed to be brought up, but if you're going to do it then at least be accurate. Since they started keeping track of the +/- stats in 2002, no player in the NBA has done more to elevate his teams than Garnett. Not Duncan, not Kobe, not LeBron. And not Pierce.
Oh yeah, and as far as defense goes, KG tended to have a similar on-court/off-court defensive impact for the Wolves as he's had for the Celtics. The difference is, here the defense without him would be almost average so his impact takes it from average to epic. In Minnesota, the defense without him was putrid, so he took it from wretched to average.
His individual defensive impact was similar, it's all about the starting point.