Danny. It's not the trade. It's the lying. And the lying has got to stop. Please

[Eja117]

On WEEI last week

"Yes we knew it was risky. Every trade has risk in it".

Danny. Just stop. Just stop. By that logic it's ok to trade MJ for Harold Miner because after all there's risk in every trade.

I hate it when he says stuff like that.

(hyperbole alert)

rrruuuuuuunnnnnn!  It's hyperbole!

[Redz]

On WEEI last week

"Yes we knew it was risky. Every trade has risk in it".

Danny. Just stop. Just stop. By that logic it's ok to trade MJ for Harold Miner because after all there's risk in every trade.

I hate it when he says stuff like that.

(hyperbole alert)

rrruuuuuuunnnnnn!  It's hyperbole!

 

[Eja117]

On WEEI last week

"Yes we knew it was risky. Every trade has risk in it".

Danny. Just stop. Just stop. By that logic it's ok to trade MJ for Harold Miner because after all there's risk in every trade.

I hate it when he says stuff like that.

(hyperbole alert)

rrruuuuuuunnnnnn!  It's hyperbole!

 

Woah. That's like Captain Zack Branigan on Futurama

[Redz]

On WEEI last week

"Yes we knew it was risky. Every trade has risk in it".

Danny. Just stop. Just stop. By that logic it's ok to trade MJ for Harold Miner because after all there's risk in every trade.

I hate it when he says stuff like that.

(hyperbole alert)

rrruuuuuuunnnnnn!  It's hyperbole!

 

Woah. That's like Captain Zack Branigan on Futurama

He's pretty awesome.  I think I have a new avatar.

[celtic -_- pride]

Look at it this way...... all 5 guys he traded are hurt, where would we be now?

yeah i saw this as something we had to but i wouldnt of done the perk trade but the semih trades yes and hold out for brewer

[TheGreenThumb]

eja117,

I can guarantee that if I read all your posts, analyze and over-analyze everything that you have said or written, I will find inconsistencies.

Should I then conclude that you're lying?

[celtics2]

YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!

[Eja117]

eja117,

I can guarantee that if I read all your posts, analyze and over-analyze everything that you have said or written, I will find inconsistencies.

Should I then conclude that you're lying?

absolutely

[Jon]

Doesn't bringing back this thread simply prove that everyone who called Danny a liar a month and a half ago was wrong?  Jermaine O'Neal has returned and looks the best he has in two years and Shaq did return and looked brilliant until he got another unrelated injury. 

[Roy H.]

Doesn't bringing back this thread simply prove that everyone who called Danny a liar a month and a half ago was wrong?  Jermaine O'Neal has returned and looks the best he has in two years and Shaq did return and looked brilliant until he got another unrelated injury. 

JO, yes. Shaq, no way. Dr. McKeon said his current injury is related to both the calf and achilles. You really think it's completely unrelated?

[mgent]

Nah he's still resting.

[biggs]

Ainge rules!!!

TP

[Jon]

Doesn't bringing back this thread simply prove that everyone who called Danny a liar a month and a half ago was wrong?  Jermaine O'Neal has returned and looks the best he has in two years and Shaq did return and looked brilliant until he got another unrelated injury.  

JO, yes. Shaq, no way. Dr. McKeon said his current injury is related to both the calf and achilles. You really think it's completely unrelated?

First of all, I hadn't heard they were related.  I've read McKeon's comments about blood supply there, but nothing on that they are related.  

Maybe they are, maybe they aren't.  However, the liar comment is still absolutely proven false: Shaq did return before the end of the year looking quite spry.  Unless Danny made some sort of guarantee that he'd never hurt his leg again, I don't see how my original post is at all inaccurate.  

Also, I'm not here to defend the trade or anything of that sort.  If you want to hate the trade, hate the trade.  But it doesn't mean that every word out of Danny Ainge's mouth is a lie. 

[Roy H.]

Doesn't bringing back this thread simply prove that everyone who called Danny a liar a month and a half ago was wrong?  Jermaine O'Neal has returned and looks the best he has in two years and Shaq did return and looked brilliant until he got another unrelated injury.  

JO, yes. Shaq, no way. Dr. McKeon said his current injury is related to both the calf and achilles. You really think it's completely unrelated?

First of all, I hadn't heard they were related.  I've read McKeon's comments about blood supply there, but nothing on that they are related.  

Maybe they are, maybe they aren't.  However, the liar comment is still absolutely proven false: Shaq did return before the end of the year looking quite spry.  Unless Danny made some sort of guarantee that he'd never hurt his leg again, I don't see how my original post is at all inaccurate.  

Also, I'm not here to defend the trade or anything of that sort.  If you want to hate the trade, hate the trade.  But it doesn't mean that every word out of Danny Ainge's mouth is a lie. 

I guess I just don't consider 5 minutes of healthy play, followed by reinjury to the same body part, as a ringing endorsement of Shaq's healthy return.

[Eja117]

Doesn't bringing back this thread simply prove that everyone who called Danny a liar a month and a half ago was wrong?  Jermaine O'Neal has returned and looks the best he has in two years and Shaq did return and looked brilliant until he got another unrelated injury. 

Sort of. I said either he lies about injuries or the team has med staff issues. I'm starting to think they have med staff issues.