If you're going to make that statement, tell me who they should have signed instead (who realistically could have been available).
Toronto signed Amir Johnson for only a bit more than Miller got. He's now averaging 10 points and 6.9 rebounds in 26 minutes a game.
Louis Amundson signed a 2 year, 4.6 million dollar deal with Golden State. He's averaging 3.6 points and 4.1 rebounds in just under 15 minutes a game.
Either one would be better than Big Z, who can shoot jumpers but is next to useless defensively, or Anthony and Dampier, who can play defense but are completely useless on offense.
Mike
That's great hindsight. Start with the most sought after FA centers, not the few out of the many signings that have worked out. And are either of your guys offensive threats from the outside like Z?
I said Miami needed to focus on bigs instead of Miller from the very beginning. Haslem going down certainly made things worse, but do you think Miami would really be that much better off with Haslem playing most of the game at the 5, which is clearly what the plan was?
Mike
Yes? Haslem is a quality big and a double-double machine. Why wouldn't Miami be better off again?
And Miller being shopped kind of supports every single point I and others have ever made on this subject.
No, it really doesn't.
Felton is far better than either Arroyo or Chalmers. There's no argument. If you're going to tell me than Wade and LeBron can only play with sub-mediocre point guards, I don't know if I can argue with that.
Is it your contention that Felton would've taken far less money to play with the Heat than to start for the Knicks and be a second banana while being paid more? I highly, highly doubt that. Additionally, I'm not even convinced that Felton would've been a good fit in Miami. He can't shoot the ball and since he wouldn't have the ball much to begin with and isn't a great defender - what role would he have had?