I dunno man, we may be using the term superstar a little loosely. Was Bernard King a superstar? Adrian Dantley? This is the level of player Melo is.
Was Pierce a superstar in 02-06? Because Carmelo is a marginally better version of Pierce from those seasons right now.
EDIT: I'm not saying Pierce was or wasn't a 'superstar'..I'm just saying...that's what NY is getting.
I just would never gut my franchise for that. The most underrated thing Danny Ainge has ever done is refuse to let Rondo or Perk be a part of the Ray and KG deals. He knew that if he couldn't put a team around them than the new players, even a top 5 PF of all time, would mean diddly.The Knicks just gutted their roster of their 2nd, 3rd and 4th most talented players, I don't see how adding a superstar to that helps all that much.
Well, I'd contest that they gutted their team...or I guess more accurately, that what they gave up compares to in any way to what they're getting back.
They're a .500 team. Felton (whether because of the trade rumors or whatever) was not playing like he was in the beginning of the season. They were not going to keep Wilson Chandler if they resigned Melo in the off-season...so don't even think about Chandler in the situation long-term.
Really what they did was decide to trade Raymond Felton, Gallinari, a mid-round 1st, and a project center for one of the best scorers in the game, rather than keep Gallinari and hope that the Nuggets don't get Anthony to sign an extension with them or any other team before the end of the season.
They got the bird in hand..and really it came down to maybe losing Carmelo but keeping Gallinari, who Carmelo was replacing in the starting lineup, or just getting Carmelo, but this time for realsies.
Plus, much like Miami, this whole thing doesn't really shake out until next season, or the season after. Ironically, the biggest missing piece for both Miami and NY now is Kendrick Perkins.