« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Lebron and Amare would have been better?  (Read 4074 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Lebron and Amare would have been better?
« Reply #15 on: February 09, 2011, 12:57:04 PM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123
Quote from: rickyfan3.0... on February 09, 2011, 12:54:28 PM
The Heat should have signed Bosh instead of Bosh. That would have been insane.

   Yes, but could they have signed Bosh for less money than they signed Bosh for? That would have been a neat trick.
Logged
Re: Lebron and Amare would have been better?
« Reply #16 on: February 09, 2011, 01:59:16 PM »

Offline GreenEnvy

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4673
  • Tommy Points: 1043
Quote from: BballTim on February 09, 2011, 12:57:04 PM
Quote from: rickyfan3.0... on February 09, 2011, 12:54:28 PM
The Heat should have signed Bosh instead of Bosh. That would have been insane.

   Yes, but could they have signed Bosh for less money than they signed Bosh for? That would have been a neat trick.

I don't know how well it would've worked with Bosh, at least not like it has with Bosh. Whether they made the right decision in signing Bosh over Bosh, time will tell. Regardless, both Bosh and Bosh are soft tough-guy tools.
Logged
CELTICS 2024
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »