Author Topic: Rather play with four players than have Nate on the court  (Read 8319 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Rather play with four players than have Nate on the court
« on: February 07, 2011, 09:40:00 PM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
What better time for him to step up than now, with all of the injuries? Yet again tonight he is garbage. I am sorry for continuing to beat this drum, but the guy absolutely stinks. He is worthless and a Complete negative on the court. Trade him for a bag of balls.

Re: Rather play with four players than have Nate on the court
« Reply #1 on: February 07, 2011, 09:41:07 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
What better time for him to step up than now, with all of the injuries? Yet again tonight he is garbage. I am sorry for continuing to beat this drum, but the guy absolutely stinks. He is worthless and a Complete negative on the court. Trade him for a bag of balls.
Then stop doing it.

Re: Rather play with four players than have Nate on the court
« Reply #2 on: February 07, 2011, 09:41:32 PM »

Offline pearljammer10

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13129
  • Tommy Points: 885
Tough match up for him tonight. Livingston is like a full foot taller than him.

Re: Rather play with four players than have Nate on the court
« Reply #3 on: February 07, 2011, 09:41:53 PM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
What better time for him to step up than now, with all of the injuries? Yet again tonight he is garbage. I am sorry for continuing to beat this drum, but the guy absolutely stinks. He is worthless and a Complete negative on the court. Trade him for a bag of balls.
Then stop doing it.

Not until they get rid of him.

Re: Rather play with four players than have Nate on the court
« Reply #4 on: February 07, 2011, 09:41:57 PM »

Offline pearljammer10

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13129
  • Tommy Points: 885
What better time for him to step up than now, with all of the injuries? Yet again tonight he is garbage. I am sorry for continuing to beat this drum, but the guy absolutely stinks. He is worthless and a Complete negative on the court. Trade him for a bag of balls.
Then stop doing it.

Agreed.

Re: Rather play with four players than have Nate on the court
« Reply #5 on: February 07, 2011, 09:43:12 PM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
Yes, Nate cannot guard livngston, but agin on offense he produced zero, missing wide open threes again

Re: Rather play with four players than have Nate on the court
« Reply #6 on: February 07, 2011, 09:43:21 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
What better time for him to step up than now, with all of the injuries? Yet again tonight he is garbage. I am sorry for continuing to beat this drum, but the guy absolutely stinks. He is worthless and a Complete negative on the court. Trade him for a bag of balls.
Then stop doing it.

Not until they get rid of him.
Then don't apologize for something you're not sorry for.

Nate is a decent backup PG, who's played poorly this year it happens. They're not getting rid of him. Hopefully West will be able to earn his minutes later in the year.

Re: Rather play with four players than have Nate on the court
« Reply #7 on: February 07, 2011, 09:44:00 PM »

Offline Megatron

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1586
  • Tommy Points: 136
He sucks and im done defending him.

Two good games this entire year isnt enough to defend his roster spot.

Re: Rather play with four players than have Nate on the court
« Reply #8 on: February 07, 2011, 09:44:39 PM »

Offline pearljammer10

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13129
  • Tommy Points: 885
Yes, Nate cannot guard livngston, but agin on offense he produced zero, missing wide open threes again

But he was also being guarded by Livingston when he was on offense, who was still a full foot taller than him.

Re: Rather play with four players than have Nate on the court
« Reply #9 on: February 07, 2011, 09:46:08 PM »

Offline Eja117

  • NCE
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19274
  • Tommy Points: 1254
What better time for him to step up than now, with all of the injuries? Yet again tonight he is garbage. I am sorry for continuing to beat this drum, but the guy absolutely stinks. He is worthless and a Complete negative on the court. Trade him for a bag of balls.
Then stop doing it.

Not until they get rid of him.
Then don't apologize for something you're not sorry for.

Yeah! Fafnir never does. You shouldn't either.

Re: Rather play with four players than have Nate on the court
« Reply #10 on: February 07, 2011, 09:46:23 PM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
Yes, Nate cannot guard livngston, but agin on offense he produced zero, missing wide open threes again

But he was also being guarded by Livingston when he was on offense, who was still a full foot taller than him.

Sometimes livingston was guarding him, sometimes not. Bottom line is the guy has played like 4 good games all year and has added nothing to this team.

Re: Rather play with four players than have Nate on the court
« Reply #11 on: February 07, 2011, 09:46:58 PM »

Offline LarryForThree

  • The Green Kornet
  • Posts: 98
  • Tommy Points: 21
What better time for him to step up than now, with all of the injuries? Yet again tonight he is garbage. I am sorry for continuing to beat this drum, but the guy absolutely stinks. He is worthless and a Complete negative on the court. Trade him for a bag of balls.

Tell me more about this bag of balls.

Re: Rather play with four players than have Nate on the court
« Reply #12 on: February 07, 2011, 09:49:08 PM »

Offline Megatron

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1586
  • Tommy Points: 136
Yes, Nate cannot guard livngston, but agin on offense he produced zero, missing wide open threes again

But he was also being guarded by Livingston when he was on offense, who was still a full foot taller than him.

Sometimes livingston was guarding him, sometimes not. Bottom line is the guy has played like 4 good games all year and has added nothing to this team.

Pretty much. Nate Robison had a 20 point game in a blowout vs the Hawks who were missing Johnson.

He had a sprinkle of 2 other games where he score over 10 points.

Other then that hes been a HUGE liability defensively, has been our worst offensive player and in general makes horrible decisions and also turns the ball over countless times when he actually plays.

Im done with him man. Doc mentioned sitting nate a couple times this year, now hes forced to play him due to the injuries.

I dont want to see Nate in green after the deadline, we need a bigger and more consistent player.

Re: Rather play with four players than have Nate on the court
« Reply #13 on: February 07, 2011, 09:52:58 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
Yes, Nate cannot guard livngston, but agin on offense he produced zero, missing wide open threes again

But he was also being guarded by Livingston when he was on offense, who was still a full foot taller than him.

Sometimes livingston was guarding him, sometimes not. Bottom line is the guy has played like 4 good games all year and has added nothing to this team.

Pretty much. Nate Robison had a 20 point game in a blowout vs the Hawks who were missing Johnson.

He had a sprinkle of 2 other games where he score over 10 points.

Other then that hes been a HUGE liability defensively, has been our worst offensive player and in general makes horrible decisions and also turns the ball over countless times when he actually plays.

Im done with him man. Doc mentioned sitting nate a couple times this year, now hes forced to play him due to the injuries.

I dont want to see Nate in green after the deadline, we need a bigger and more consistent player.
Who are you trading him for?

What are you giving up?

Re: Rather play with four players than have Nate on the court
« Reply #14 on: February 07, 2011, 09:54:43 PM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
It is so clear now why the Knicks sat Nate for so many games. I wish the celts had Eddie house back.