.4 seconds is not a lot of time left but I have seen it happen before. If Stoudemire's shot had been a split second sooner Pierce's actions would have looked even more foolish.
My issue was that the game wasn't over yet, there were still .4 seconds left. Derek Fisher anybody? Andrew Bogut? Not that I thought there was a realistic chance that we'd lose, but it was still possible and if we miraculously did... PP would have looked like the ultimate fool and I really mean ultimate.
I wouldn't go as far to as it was classless; players are going to celebrate. But I do agree with the original poster that .4 seconds is a lot of time and I think the antics would have been more appropriate if the entire clock was used.
I think you guys are making a big false assumption here on a play you didn't even see.
They didn't show him bow on tv, right? (Not on ESPN at least, did they show it on CSNE?) I haven't seen any highlights of him bowing. I believe Paul Pierce DIDN'T bow after he hit his shot with .4 still left on the clock. He bowed after Amare hit his shot and the Knicks (including Spike Lee jumping on the court) celebrated. Check the video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRrdQsMeK2YAt about 0:14-0:42 they show Paul take a jog around the court and slap hands with his teammates, nothing over the top here at all, very average, very normal type of potential game winner celebration.
At about 2:14-2:31 you see the Knicks going wild celebrating (including Spike Lee going crazy apparently taunting the C's from 2:25-2:31). Nothing over the top or classless on the Knicks part, can't say the same for Spike though.
THEN at 3:12 Mike Breen says Pierce is bowing at center court. Pierce didn't bow until AFTER the game was over, it was clear the C's were gonna win, and Spike Lee taunted the Celtics.
Then Pierce gives an interview at 4:25 and gives the Knicks respect.
Unless somebody saw the game live and could tell me he bowed after his shot .4 still left on the clock, I gotta say you guys got your facts wrong.