Author Topic: Nate at Point Not so sure  (Read 4614 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Nate at Point Not so sure
« Reply #15 on: December 05, 2010, 07:17:38 AM »

Offline anthony83

  • Derrick White
  • Posts: 448
  • Tommy Points: 36
For me Nate is not a pure point-guard, is more of a scorer and a penetrator, but is a major player, especially when parties are engaged.
I hope Delonte gets well soon, including Rondo, Nate and West we cover that position of point-guards.

Danny AI is in Turkey,I would love to see Iverson in Boston and win the ring against the Lakers ;)

BEAT L.A  BEAT L.A  BEAT L.A  GOOOOOOOO CELTICS¡¡¡¡

 WE ARE THE BEST

Twitter: @Theanswer83

Re: Nate at Point Not so sure
« Reply #16 on: December 05, 2010, 04:41:24 PM »

Offline celtics2

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 847
  • Tommy Points: 42
Well if he starts hitting shots again like todays NJ game we won't care much how he distributes.

I am extremely impressed by this teams performance. Shaq has brought a new revived excitement. His performances have been admirable. We have now a force inside like we haven't had for years. Perk is a force but a *foul* one. He wastes fouls. KG is healthy and down deep
must be astounded by us getting Shaq. The best starting 5 in Basketball and the bench is jelling with the play of Davis.

Re: Nate at Point Not so sure
« Reply #17 on: December 05, 2010, 04:55:22 PM »

Offline Meadowlark_Scal

  • NCE
  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8193
  • Tommy Points: 670
  • You say when......
Rondo is hurt...REST HIM until the hamstring is 100%.....it will take 1 month....the foot doesn't help.

Re: Nate at Point Not so sure
« Reply #18 on: December 05, 2010, 06:47:01 PM »

Offline guava_wrench

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9931
  • Tommy Points: 777
For me Nate is not a pure point-guard, is more of a scorer and a penetrator, but is a major player, especially when parties are engaged.
I hope Delonte gets well soon, including Rondo, Nate and West we cover that position of point-guards.

Danny AI is in Turkey,I would love to see Iverson in Boston and win the ring against the Lakers ;)

BEAT L.A  BEAT L.A  BEAT L.A  GOOOOOOOO CELTICS¡¡¡¡

 WE ARE THE BEST

With the way our offense is clicking, why would we bring one of the least efficient scorers to our team when he also doesn't play defense?

I have nothing against letting AI come to Boston to watch games courtside though, if that's what you meant.

Re: Nate at Point Not so sure
« Reply #19 on: December 05, 2010, 07:47:29 PM »

Offline paul

  • Xavier Tillman Sr.
  • Posts: 49
  • Tommy Points: 15
I think Robinson has done surprisingly well as the pg, and I think there is a message in it:  Learn To Shoot, Rondo!!  This statement from Rivers strikes me as fairly pointed ...

""Nate was great," coach Doc Rivers said after the win. "He was just solid. Offensively, you knew you were going to be fine, because he gives you another shooter out on the floor.""

Rondo seems to have almost unlimited talent - but that inability to shoot effectively will become MORE glaring as he becomes better, ironically.

Re: Nate at Point Not so sure
« Reply #20 on: December 05, 2010, 08:18:17 PM »

Offline clover

  • Front Page Moderator
  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6130
  • Tommy Points: 315
Rondo is hurt...REST HIM until the hamstring is 100%.....it will take 1 month....the foot doesn't help.

If he had sat four games instead of three, he'd have had an extra five days to heal and would probably be fine.  I lay the blame for this one on the training/medical team and maybe somewhat on Doc, who should have held him out another game just for caution.

Re: Nate at Point Not so sure
« Reply #21 on: December 05, 2010, 10:32:22 PM »

Offline guava_wrench

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9931
  • Tommy Points: 777
Rondo is hurt...REST HIM until the hamstring is 100%.....it will take 1 month....the foot doesn't help.

If he had sat four games instead of three, he'd have had an extra five days to heal and would probably be fine.  I lay the blame for this one on the training/medical team and maybe somewhat on Doc, who should have held him out another game just for caution.
How do you know the third game wasn't the extra game for caution?