Nobody is making excuses for the parents. They are a guilty responsible party. But the Lakers are being excused. They are also a guilty responsible party.
A strong boy like mine could climb over a wall in about 2 seconds. When places don't make any effort whatsoever to baby proof places these things happen no matter how good parents are. When you have a 20,000 seat arena even if every parent was an above average parent eventually something would happen. Therefore if you let babies in the area you try to baby proof it or you don't let them in. Obviously that didn't happen. It was "Sure we'll take your money and let your kid sit in a dangerous place"
Parents sometimes assume things have been tested for safety rather than left dangerous. It's a bad assumption.
The local law enforcement is right to investigate and be dealing with the parents. But they need to sit with the Lakers too and not give them a free pass.
So do you think every single public place that does not strictly forbid children needs to be "babyproofed"? I just think its asking a lot, and it also is taking way too much responsibility from the parents.
I mean, should fountains in public parks have safety fences? Should all balconies (sporting events, theaters, etc.) have glass up that cannot be climbed over?
Look at the Garden, or Fenway. Those are certainly not baby proof. If a child was sitting in the front row of the balcony, they could very easily climb over the front.
Now, if we are talking about Chucky Cheese, or Disneyworld, then I agree, then parents can make a safe assumption that things are safe for their children. However, it is an incredibly slippery slope when you get into things that are not actually made for children.
Perhaps the solution should be that no children below a certain age are allowed in these arenas though. I think that is a much more reasonable way to do it...and frankly, there is absolutely no reason a 2 year old should be at a basketball game anyways.