I disagree with this big time. The Celtics wouldn't have retired Barkley's number? Not sure on this, but I'm pretty sure the Celtics have retired more numbers than any other team, including the likes of Satch Sanders, Bill Sharman, Ed Macauley, Frank Ramsey, and Jim Loscutoff.... If Rondo stays with the Celtics his whole career and doesn't suffer any serious injuries, he should get his number retired, because he's gonna put up silly assist and steal numbers and he's already been NBA first team all defense.
Satch Sanders: 8 titles
Bill Sharman: 4 titles
Loscutoff: 7 titles
Guys with less than 2 Championships as players with their #'s retired:
Ed McCauley, Red Auerbach, Walter Brown, Reggie Lewis
Guys who played after '70 with less than 2 titles as a player with their #'s retired:
Reggie Lewis
Tell me how Barkely would've been retired if he had won no chips?
How many players have we had that were as good as Barkley that didn't get their numbers retired? And, note, Barkely made all nba 1st team 5 times and 2nd team 5 times, PP made all 2nd team once. Paul's only top 10 finish in MVP voting was in 08-09 when he finished 6th, Barkley has finished 6th or better 8 times. If you're saying Barkley wouldn't have had his number retired without a title, you're saying PP wouldn't have been close to being in the discussion for having his number retired without the title.
I am saying exactly that. PP would not have had his # retired without winning a title.
But unless you can point to players of that caliber that were on the Celts for the bulk of their careers and didn't have their numbers retired it's just speculation on your part. I don't know of a precedent of such players not having their numbers retired.
Oh absolutely its just speculation. I'm not saying I'm an authority on it or anything. Its hard to find a precedent because of how successful the Celtics have been. My point is that while in cities like Minnesota or Philadelphia or Dallas where they haven't won any or many titles, Pierce would be a shoe-in. Here though I think there is a higher standard. Guys who are core parts of title teams, especially multiple title teams, tend to be rewarded.
But, there hasn't been a guy who has been with the C's as long as Pierce had, and been his level of production for as long as Pierce has, who hasn't won a title in the last 40 years, so it is impossible to find a precedent for the C's.