I'm sure someone has quantified this somewhere, but I'd love to know how effective it is to take charges (in general) versus going for the shotblock.
Obviously some players are better at drawing charges than others (quicker, better footwork). For some players, their other limitations (lack of a decent vertical leap) make taking charges one of the only ways they can be a good defensive player.
Still.... sure seems that two times our of three, players who try to take charges seem to get called for blocking fouls, putting the offensive player on the line for two freebies (or an And-1). Skilled ballhanders often will go by a statue-esque defender. There's no chance of a blocked shot (granted, going for the block will often result in a foul anyway)
Is taking charges REALLY an effective defensive strategy? How effective do you have to be at getting the charge called for it to be a better strategy than going for the block/trying to alter the shot?
Since people are tracking the number of charges players take, do they also track the number of *attempted* charges that get called as blocking fouls?
I don't know the answers to any of this, I've just been skeptical and wondered if anyone's ever come across any good analysis on this.