Author Topic: No Rebounds; No Glory  (Read 9011 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: No Rebounds; No Glory
« Reply #45 on: November 07, 2010, 09:46:32 AM »

Offline crownsy

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8469
  • Tommy Points: 157
After 6 games, we're ranked #23 in rebounding as a team.  The statistic is a little bit misleading because it counts the total number of boards.  For a team that plays lower scoring games you figure there are less shot attempts and less opportunites to accumulate rebounds. 

Now if you look at rebounding differential, we are ranked #10.  We average a little more than 1 board per game than our opponenet.

Last night against CHI was the first game were beaten badly on the glass (43-31) and I think that was a big reason why CHI was able to make a comeback.  Note that CHI is ranked #2 in rebounding differential.

Once SON comes back and JON is at 100% we should be much better.  The past few games has seen a lot of Baby and KG as the frontline, and that was considered our small lineup last year that didn't fare too well.  But I think another factor is KG appears to be much more healthy this year.  He's already had a 15 rebound game and is just about averaging a double double.  You can see that he is comfortably dunking from 4-5 feet out when last year he sometimes had trouble from 1-2 feet out. 

We're not going to be the best rebounding team this year, but it's not going to be our Achilles heel either.

It's also hurt by the fact that our defensive scheme takes away from our offensive rebounding opportunity's.

I like the system, that you favor getting back on defense over crashing the glass if your not in the paint when the shot goes up, and it certainly limits the other teams ability to score in transition.

Still annoying at times though. That's why players like Baby and even semih are so valuable, they tend to live in the paint and at least give us SOME sort of rebounding threat.
“I will hurt you for this. A day will come when you think you’re safe and happy and your joy will turn to ashes in your mouth. And you will know the debt is paid.” – Tyrion

Re: No Rebounds; No Glory
« Reply #46 on: November 07, 2010, 10:44:11 AM »

Offline Bankshot

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7540
  • Tommy Points: 632
Did anyone hear how many rebounds Baby got his hands on in the Chicago game? Sean Grande(super Baby supporter) mentioned more than a few times "Baby couldn't grab the rebound". There was a lot of "Baby drop it out of bounds" as well. I don't know how many Baby ended up with, but it gets me angry to hear that as many times in one game. Sean did mention Baby was having a horrible game, which shocked me. He usually stops commentating to give a Baby endorsement. I don't get the logic in staying with a player who keeps fumbling the rock, while the lead is clearly being challenged. We know what Baby rather do with those hands, I guess.
Quote
Nowadays, Big Baby, who got his name for his size and sensitivity during his elementary years in Louisiana, has a daily regimen of moisturizing, brushing and buffing himself into top form.

Davis said simply: “They were surprised at some of the things I do.”

Also include liberal use of Lubriderm lotion to keep his hands soft. He gets manicures twice a month, and favors – without apology – a clear top coat. The stereotypical “guys-as-grimy-and-rough” image is outdated, he said. “My generation is changing. Guys are doing the same things women are doing,” he said.


Baby had a bad game, especially with fumbling the ball.  But he usually has great hands, just a bad game for him, nothing more.  But he's clutch and came up big in OT when it mattered.
"If somebody would have told you when he was playing with the Knicks that Nate Robinson was going to change a big time game and he was going to do it mostly because of his defense, somebody would have got slapped."  Mark Jackson

Re: No Rebounds; No Glory
« Reply #47 on: November 07, 2010, 11:05:05 AM »

Offline Jevi

  • Neemias Queta
  • Posts: 195
  • Tommy Points: 21
Davis had 3 rebounds.  Pretty bad, but it was 3 more than JO managed to grab with his hands.
Poppycock,Baby played 37 minutes compared to Jo's 19 and doesn't Jermaine actually have a hand injury?

Re: No Rebounds; No Glory
« Reply #48 on: November 07, 2010, 11:20:47 AM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123
Davis had 3 rebounds.  Pretty bad, but it was 3 more than JO managed to grab with his hands.
Poppycock,Baby played 37 minutes compared to Jo's 19 and doesn't Jermaine actually have a hand injury?


  Glen's been a slightly better rebounder than JO all year, and JO currently has some type of injury to most parts of his body.