i think the technical fouls called last year were alright already in terms of "controlling players". IMO, they could've been called looser actually, especially with regards to double T's but whatever.
I don't think citing the fact that some guys can keep their cool while others can't is a valid argument. It's like saying, how come some guys can perform in the clutch (Paul Pierce) while others can't (Vince Carter)? Because some people are able to keep their head in that situation while others can't take the pressure. Controlling your emotions is a skill, but in a setting where you have to absolutely fight for everything (position, rebounds, screens, loose balls, etc.), i can understand how some guys can be really amped up and get upset, ESPECIALLY if they think they are innocent. If you, the fan, have ever watched a live broadcast and you've gotten upset at the TV because of a ref's blown whistle at least once in your life and you've reacted with an outraged "what?!" or something similar, then i'm sure you can kind of understand what the players are going through themselves. And to think, you're only watching on TV! It's different when you're watching in the arena, and it's different when you're on the floor.
I'm not defending all players' reactions, but i think you have to be able to give players time to react. It's an emotional game and when a player gets called for a foul he didn't commit, it can be exasperating. Add to this, some players need this emotion to be able to mentally get into games (KG) while others go about it in a more methodical fashion (Ray Allen).
regarding "incessant complaining", it's a fast game. I'll admit that the refs often do a great job but despite that, they're not able to see everything that's going on out there. And this is why players still approach refs "lobbying for calls" and giving them additional heads up as to what's going on. I figure they often say what they feel like the other team or a particular player has been getting away with throughout the game. I figure they're also asking the ref what's ok and what's not ok to do. What's a foul and what isn't because as a poster had said previously, it changes every game. They're not berating the refs or getting in their face. They're speaking in a civilized manner.
A situation comes to mind about poor technicals, Perkins v. Magic in game... 5 was it? He gets called for a foul he didn't commit. He goes "what?!" but walks away and grumbles to himself but he still gets called for his 2nd tech. I'm pretty sure that call changed the game.
i know refs are human and they can get upset at certain player's antics, but isn't that part of their job description?? To police the game and remain impartial at all times? If anything, these guys are the ones who should be the ones to keep a cool head, not the players.
- LilRip