Okay nick ignore the fact that player production is very consistent on a per minute business. I'll still take Ilyasova's numbers in those minutes.
He's using less time to produce points at an equivalent rate (at comparable efficiency) and secure two more rebounds.
I'm ignoring nothing. Similar points at comparable efficiency and two more rebounds is significant difference??
Significant!!!
Come on Faf. Slightly better. A bit better. I can see. Significant? All the while Baby was playing playoff competition while Ilyasova, at least according to the team's IP just listed, got to put up some of his numbers versus the likes of New Jersey, Memphis, Sacramento, Washington, New York and Detroit.
Tell you what. You take Ilyasova's inflated stats versus horrible teams. I'll take the stats of Baby versus playoff competition.
Actually how did Ilyasova do in the playoffs. About the same as he did in the regular season. Hmm....Baby always seems to elevate his game in the playoffs
But Ilyasova is an exceptional player with significantly better starting stats than Baby and Baby is what...just a bench guy.
Okay, let me say this about big baby. If he here 2-3 inches taller, he'd be a completely different player. he'd be a 100% starter in the NBA. Glen Davis is a heck of a player and he just wasn't blessed with Barkley's athleticism or a shoeless height of 6'9 or better.
And in the playoffs, with the Bucs shortened rotation, Ilyasova got 22 minutes per.
He still managed 9.4 points, 7.6 rebounds, upped his FG% to 48%, and upped his 3pt% to 36%
In the last playoff game against the Hawks he got 31 minutes, and he managed 13 points and 11 boards on a bad shooting day.
You can dismiss everything I've thrown out there, tell me the games against Atlanta (5/2), Phoenix (4/3), Chicago (4/6), and Denver (3/20) were all 'fluke' games and say the games NJ, MEM, SAC, WAS, DET, and NY as all insignificant because they didn't make the playoffs, or just dismiss it because its a small sample size...or I'm guessing sooner or later you'll say 'if he was a legitimate starter, he'd be starting in Milwaukee over Mbah a Moute' (and I don't say that angrily, its just the next logical argument), but none of that is anymore theoretical than what I'm saying.
I think there is a good case for Ilyasova being an average to above average starter next season, especially next to LeBron, you do not, does that about sum it up?
No that does not some it up at all. If you had simply said
"I think there is a good case for Ilyasova being an average to above average starter next season, especially next to LeBron"
And Fafnir had called the difference in stats between Baby and Ilyasova "better"
I probably wouldn't have even commented. But the hyperbole with which people go through to sell there teams is going overboard here.
"Exceptional" player?
"Significant" difference?
Please people, let's keep things grounded here.
Ilyasova is an average PF. Playing with Lebron his numbers could improve. Could!! Given your team, other teams might find it easier to lock down your other players and just try to make Lebron beat them singlehandedly, whereby it is possible his numbers might not improve.
I think Ilyasova's starting numbers are slightly better than numbers that Baby put up starting in 2008-09. Slightly. The word significant I might save for the difference between Paul Pierce and Tony Allen or Derrick Rose and Steve Blake or Tim Duncan and Spencer Hawes. Significant is not a word I would use to describe the difference between Glen Davis and Ersan Ilyasova or their stats.