0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: birdwatcher on July 19, 2010, 05:48:51 PMWhy give up one of the best defensive big men in the game? So what if he can't score. We need a guy like Perk, and he's still very young. He may be injured, but he'll just come back stronger--what else will he have to do besides workout and watch film?I actually do have a problem with the fact that Perk can't score. People seem very content about our future with Perk at center. Over the past 3 years, Perk has been a phenomenal defensive stalwart in the paint for us. We have been very successful because he hasn't needed to score and does his role superbly. The reason he hasn't had to score is because he's surrounded by Rondo and 3 future HOF'ers who all have been able to score 23+ ppg for multiple seasons in their careers. That is a true rarity.Looking forward, he will have the same point guard, who indeed should improve. But, there is large doubt that he will have 3 bonafide scorers at his side though. Rondo is never going to be a bonafide scorer, he may reach 20 ppg on a contending team which would be his ceiling. Perk might sniff 10 ppg a few times. Without 3 other premier scorers (like I said are very difficult to obtain), I think this team might be too offensively challenged to contend perennially. Look at how our team struggled midseason with just 1 of our stars out or playing hurt.
Why give up one of the best defensive big men in the game? So what if he can't score. We need a guy like Perk, and he's still very young. He may be injured, but he'll just come back stronger--what else will he have to do besides workout and watch film?