Author Topic: Would you take Sessions if it meant landing Brewer?  (Read 8171 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Would you take Sessions if it meant landing Brewer?
« Reply #30 on: July 14, 2010, 09:40:48 PM »

Offline PosImpos

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12383
  • Tommy Points: 903
  • Rondo = Good
Kahn isn't brain-dead; plus, SG is one of the few positions where the Wolves don't have a ton of depth.

Won't ever happen.  It's not as if Sessions is a worthless player.  He can still do a lot for the Wolves, and he's important for them as long as Flynn is still developing as a passer.
Never forget the Champs of '08, or the gutsy warriors of '10.

"I know you all wanna win, but you gotta do it TOGETHER!"
- Doc Rivers

Re: Would you take Sessions if it meant landing Brewer?
« Reply #31 on: July 14, 2010, 09:59:11 PM »

Offline ssspence

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6375
  • Tommy Points: 403
Absolutely! Brewer is wanted back in Utah; but only if they loose Matthews.

http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpages/player_main.aspx?id=1261&sport=nba

not  ronnie, bro! we're talking corey here -- who i prefer.

Mike

(My name is not Mike)

Re: Would you take Sessions if it meant landing Brewer?
« Reply #32 on: July 14, 2010, 10:10:30 PM »

Offline ssspence

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6375
  • Tommy Points: 403
Kahn isn't brain-dead; plus, SG is one of the few positions where the Wolves don't have a ton of depth.

Won't ever happen.  It's not as if Sessions is a worthless player.  He can still do a lot for the Wolves, and he's important for them as long as Flynn is still developing as a passer.

You're missing some key stuff here :

1) they're going to dump Sessions. they just signed Ridnour to THE SAME deal they gave Sessions last year, and they already have Flynn and the rights to Rubio. They're openly shopping despite limited options. He's gone;

2) David Kahn is extracting every single player from the Wolves roster who was there when we arrived, with the exception of Love. Everyone but Love -- period;

3) David Kahn is in love with draft picks.  He just traded Al Jefferson for a bag of chips and picks. He won't trade Brewer for a pick?

4) Brewer is really a SF, a position they've decided to overload with Webster, Beasley (don't tell me he's a 4), Wesley Johnson and Lazar Haywood. Yes, some of them will have to play out of position like Brewer has, but not sure they really need a role guy when they're basically terrible and #3 above exists.

Just don't tell me Brewer is untouchable with David Kahn at the wheel. You can't say so cuz you just can't know....
Mike

(My name is not Mike)

Re: Would you take Sessions if it meant landing Brewer?
« Reply #33 on: July 14, 2010, 10:28:48 PM »

Offline ssspence

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6375
  • Tommy Points: 403
just came up with another one that could make some sense for 3 teams, 2 of which have the dumbest front offices in the league.

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=24usngr

For Golden State: they rid themselves of Ellis to make room for Curry, get a real NBA caliber back-up 1 in Sessions who fits their system and will defer to Curry, and save money which they desperately need to do. Hollins fits PERFECTLY as a back-up 5 under Nellie. Wright has no role on this team behind Lee and Udoh.

For Minny: who cares? Kahn is crazy enough to trade for a guy like Ellis, play him at the 2, and see what happens as long as he has stretch players like Love, Webster and Beasley on the team.

For Boston: It's a dunk. An excellent wing defender and a 4 with true upside for Sheed's deal. They probably have to give up a 2nd or maybe a 1st to get these bozos to actually bite on it. Done and done.  
Mike

(My name is not Mike)

Re: Would you take Sessions if it meant landing Brewer?
« Reply #34 on: July 14, 2010, 10:32:58 PM »

Offline SCBirdman

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 478
  • Tommy Points: 31
Nice!

Re: Would you take Sessions if it meant landing Brewer?
« Reply #35 on: July 14, 2010, 10:36:25 PM »

Offline Evantime34

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11942
  • Tommy Points: 764
  • Eagerly Awaiting the Next Fantasy Draft
If GSW could get a first from us they probably do that.
DKC:  Rockets
CB Draft: Memphis Grizz
Players: Klay Thompson, Jabari Parker, Aaron Gordon
Next 3 picks: 4.14, 4.15, 4.19

Re: Would you take Sessions if it meant landing Brewer?
« Reply #36 on: July 14, 2010, 10:42:26 PM »

Offline ssspence

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6375
  • Tommy Points: 403
If GSW could get a first from us they probably do that.

i think it's Minn that would need more enticing....
Mike

(My name is not Mike)