Author Topic: Why was Perk not playing in the 4th?  (Read 4366 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Why was Perk not playing in the 4th?
« on: June 08, 2010, 11:57:41 PM »

Offline ibby

  • Brad Stevens
  • Posts: 226
  • Tommy Points: 18
I only got to catch the end of the 3rd and the whole 4th quarter because I was in class until late, so why did Perk not play in what seemed like the entire 4th quarter?

Re: Why was Perk not playing in the 4th?
« Reply #1 on: June 09, 2010, 12:08:31 AM »

Offline Bankshot

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7540
  • Tommy Points: 632
Because his offense stinks and Baby was getting us back in the game.  What we needed was TA instead of Ray.
"If somebody would have told you when he was playing with the Knicks that Nate Robinson was going to change a big time game and he was going to do it mostly because of his defense, somebody would have got slapped."  Mark Jackson

Re: Why was Perk not playing in the 4th?
« Reply #2 on: June 09, 2010, 12:10:55 AM »

Offline ibby

  • Brad Stevens
  • Posts: 226
  • Tommy Points: 18
Ok.  I thought maybe he had picked up a T.  I feel a bit better now.

Re: Why was Perk not playing in the 4th?
« Reply #3 on: June 09, 2010, 12:37:14 AM »

Offline jimmehx

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1257
  • Tommy Points: 166
Perk has been playing terribly and really escaping blame for our shortcomings.

Baby was incredible tonight - apart from a couple of unfortunate offensive fouls.

Perk hasn't shown up yet.


"Uhhh... Wife makes chicken..." - Brian Scalabrine 2007.

Re: Why was Perk not playing in the 4th?
« Reply #4 on: June 09, 2010, 01:07:02 AM »

Offline BirdLegend33

  • Baylor Scheierman
  • Posts: 15
  • Tommy Points: 2
Perkins hasn't done much of anything useful for the team for the most part. He's a big baby and his crying to officials may cost the team dearly. He turns the ball over, gets his shots blocked and can't even play enough good defense at times and gets out rebounded.

Re: Why was Perk not playing in the 4th?
« Reply #5 on: June 09, 2010, 01:38:15 AM »

Offline FallGuy

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1941
  • Tommy Points: 70
Perk did a good job on the boards tonight.

But I'm ready to see him moved this summer.

Too limited offensively.  Too much of a hothead.

And he still has good value around the league.

Re: Why was Perk not playing in the 4th?
« Reply #6 on: June 09, 2010, 03:15:32 AM »

Offline PosImpos

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12383
  • Tommy Points: 903
  • Rondo = Good
We needed offense.  That's not his thing.
Never forget the Champs of '08, or the gutsy warriors of '10.

"I know you all wanna win, but you gotta do it TOGETHER!"
- Doc Rivers

Re: Why was Perk not playing in the 4th?
« Reply #7 on: June 09, 2010, 07:38:08 AM »

Offline CoachBo

  • NCE
  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6069
  • Tommy Points: 336
Perk did a good job on the boards tonight.

But I'm ready to see him moved this summer.

Too limited offensively.  Too much of a hothead.

And he still has good value around the league.

This. Time to shop him and see if we can use him to get young offense and/or rebounding.

Not saying you give him away, but if the rumors are true, Ainge was on the right track shopping him for Boozer, IMHO.

He has become a major obstacle for this team on the offensive end with his ineptitude. Seven years in the league and he still insists on putting the ball on the floor after the catch. Amazing.
« Last Edit: June 09, 2010, 07:52:59 AM by CoachBo »
Coined the CelticsBlog term, "Euromistake."

Re: Why was Perk not playing in the 4th?
« Reply #8 on: June 09, 2010, 09:22:07 AM »

Online wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34127
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
He should have played more in the 4th.  Davis did his job great, but at that point, they were not going to him offensively. 


They could have used Perk's length on Gasol allowing KG to defend Odom who was getting off to much.  They needed stops as much as they needed points. 

Re: Why was Perk not playing in the 4th?
« Reply #9 on: June 09, 2010, 09:23:57 AM »

Offline FallGuy

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1941
  • Tommy Points: 70
Perk did a good job on the boards tonight.

But I'm ready to see him moved this summer.

Too limited offensively.  Too much of a hothead.

And he still has good value around the league.

This. Time to shop him and see if we can use him to get young offense and/or rebounding.

Not saying you give him away, but if the rumors are true, Ainge was on the right track shopping him for Boozer, IMHO.

He has become a major obstacle for this team on the offensive end with his ineptitude. Seven years in the league and he still insists on putting the ball on the floor after the catch. Amazing.

He'll also be looking for a large raise after 2011. We like/love him at $4M per. At $7.5M... not so much.

Re: Why was Perk not playing in the 4th?
« Reply #10 on: June 09, 2010, 09:35:54 AM »

Offline Andy Jick

  • Al Horford
  • ***
  • Posts: 3795
  • Tommy Points: 89
  • You know my methods, Watson.
Because he's terrible, and since he knows he can't yell and scream and scowl at the refs every 6.8 seconds (due to his technical foul status), he's about useless.

He's a modern-day Greg Kite...
"It was easier to know it than to explain why I know it."

Re: Why was Perk not playing in the 4th?
« Reply #11 on: June 09, 2010, 09:38:55 AM »

Online wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34127
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
Because he's terrible, and since he knows he can't yell and scream and scowl at the refs every 6.8 seconds (due to his technical foul status), he's about useless.

He's a modern-day Greg Kite...

Minus the good defense and 11 rebounds in 22 minutes.


Despite the fact that the Celtics were better then the Lakers when he was on the floor last night.


The Laker's big offensive explosion started when Perk was forced to the bench because of fouls. 

Re: Why was Perk not playing in the 4th?
« Reply #12 on: June 09, 2010, 09:47:55 AM »

Offline angryguy77

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7932
  • Tommy Points: 656
He should have played more in the 4th.  Davis did his job great, but at that point, they were not going to him offensively. 


They could have used Perk's length on Gasol allowing KG to defend Odom who was getting off to much.  They needed stops as much as they needed points. 

Thats what I thought while I watched the game. We had scorers in and neede a defesive presence in there. You cannot have Davis guarding Gasol like what happened last night.
Back to wanting Joe fired.

Re: Why was Perk not playing in the 4th?
« Reply #13 on: June 09, 2010, 09:48:37 AM »

Offline Andy Jick

  • Al Horford
  • ***
  • Posts: 3795
  • Tommy Points: 89
  • You know my methods, Watson.
Because he's terrible, and since he knows he can't yell and scream and scowl at the refs every 6.8 seconds (due to his technical foul status), he's about useless.

He's a modern-day Greg Kite...

Minus the good defense and 11 rebounds in 22 minutes.


Despite the fact that the Celtics were better then the Lakers when he was on the floor last night.


The Laker's big offensive explosion started when Perk was forced to the bench because of fouls. 

Maybe I was a little harsh...  How about the '87 version of Artis Gilmore that had hands of stone.  But seriously, this guy needs to be STRONG with the basketball.  He's getting raped by people because he can't hold onto the basketball.  I'd love for McHale to work with just to teach him how to do this.  'Sheed is great at being strong with the basketball, keeping the ball high.  It's as if Perk has worked so hard on getting his body in shape that his game never quite caught up to that. 

I swear we could sign Desagana Diop for so much less and get the same results...
"It was easier to know it than to explain why I know it."

Re: Why was Perk not playing in the 4th?
« Reply #14 on: June 09, 2010, 09:51:13 AM »

Online wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34127
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
Because he's terrible, and since he knows he can't yell and scream and scowl at the refs every 6.8 seconds (due to his technical foul status), he's about useless.

He's a modern-day Greg Kite...

Minus the good defense and 11 rebounds in 22 minutes.


Despite the fact that the Celtics were better then the Lakers when he was on the floor last night.


The Laker's big offensive explosion started when Perk was forced to the bench because of fouls. 

Maybe I was a little harsh...  How about the '87 version of Artis Gilmore that had hands of stone.  But seriously, this guy needs to be STRONG with the basketball.  He's getting raped by people because he can't hold onto the basketball.  I'd love for McHale to work with just to teach him how to do this.  'Sheed is great at being strong with the basketball, keeping the ball high.  It's as if Perk has worked so hard on getting his body in shape that his game never quite caught up to that. 

I swear we could sign Desagana Diop for so much less and get the same results...


While his hands needs to get better, he could have helped down the stretch get one or two more stops.