Author Topic: Eat it Grant Hill  (Read 10406 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Eat it Grant Hill
« on: May 30, 2010, 10:50:45 AM »

Offline angryguy77

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7925
  • Tommy Points: 654
You should have come to Boston. At least you would have had a shot at a ring. You are not a winner, you're the guy that's just happy to have a chance. I used to feel kind of bad for you because you're  a nice guy that had great talent, but could never get on the right team.

I've waited all year for this.

Back to wanting Joe fired.

Re: Eat it Grant Hill
« Reply #1 on: May 30, 2010, 10:54:52 AM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34114
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
He went to a team with a chance and made it further then he ever did before. 


And he stayed with a team he enjoyed playing with. 




I don't see why there is a problem with his choice.  It just didn't work out to a title this season.

Re: Eat it Grant Hill
« Reply #2 on: May 30, 2010, 10:55:51 AM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
Hill decided that he valued his family's comfort, a larger role, and a training staff that works well with him over money or a title.  It might not be the decision many of us would have made, but can we really fault a guy for prioritizing his family and his comfort level?

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: Eat it Grant Hill
« Reply #3 on: May 30, 2010, 10:58:45 AM »

Offline tb727

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1552
  • Tommy Points: 129
You should have come to Boston. At least you would have had a shot at a ring. You are not a winner, you're the guy that's just happy to have a chance. I used to feel kind of bad for you because you're  a nice guy that had great talent, but could never get on the right team.

I've waited all year for this.



Haha nice!  I was really surprised how Phoenix exceeded their expectations.  But I still agree with you 100%.
Jay Wingspan Bilas

Re: Eat it Grant Hill
« Reply #4 on: May 30, 2010, 11:00:23 AM »

Offline jax_celtsfan

  • Lonnie Walker IV
  • Posts: 53
  • Tommy Points: 7
He remained loyal to his team, why fault him for that?

Re: Eat it Grant Hill
« Reply #5 on: May 30, 2010, 11:05:43 AM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
I'm siding with Roy and wd on this one. Seems kind of wrong to fault a man for choosing what he believed was the correct choice him him, his career, his family and his comfort over the chance for a title.

I don't see the problem here. Hill is, by all indications, one of the truly nicest and classiest individuals in the NBA. I think it kind of, well what I would say would probably start a spat so I won't say it but I just think it beneath us as Celtic fans.

Re: Eat it Grant Hill
« Reply #6 on: May 30, 2010, 11:08:58 AM »

Offline angryguy77

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7925
  • Tommy Points: 654
He remained loyal to his team, why fault him for that?


Because I respect athletes who want to win. Hill could of had that. People forget that he was contemplating going to NY before he opted to stay in Phoenix.

I know we made it to the Finals w/o him, but he would have been a nice addition to the team.

Like I said, I used to feel sorry for the guy and pull for him. There are certain players that we all would like to get a ring. It sucks when you find out that one of those guys is just a born loser.
Back to wanting Joe fired.

Re: Eat it Grant Hill
« Reply #7 on: May 30, 2010, 11:11:12 AM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34114
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
He remained loyal to his team, why fault him for that?


Because I respect athletes who want to win. Hill could of had that. People forget that he was contemplating going to NY before he opted to stay in Phoenix.

I know we made it to the Finals w/o him, but he would have been a nice addition to the team.

Like I said, I used to feel sorry for the guy and pull for him. There are certain players that we all would like to get a ring. It sucks when you find out that one of those guys is just a born loser.


So winning two national titles means he is a loser?



And he picked a team that went to the Western Conference title over the Knicks.  And do you really think there was a chance he was going to the Knicks or was it a way to help negotiations? 



Yes, he didn't pick the Celtics.  (you know the team many experts were saying had their window closed during the offseason)  He decided to stay with a two time MVP. 

Re: Eat it Grant Hill
« Reply #8 on: May 30, 2010, 11:12:52 AM »

Offline ibby

  • Brad Stevens
  • Posts: 226
  • Tommy Points: 18
HI'll is not a career looser. He won 2x (almost 3x) in college. He also singlehandedly turned the Detroit teams if the mid 90s into contenders for 2 years. I know it's conjecturen, but sans injury I bet he has at least 1 ring. Plus as everyone else stated he stayed loyal to his team and made a tough decision for the good of his family. It's not like he tool the big money the Knicks were offering him, or even used that and us to squeeze more money out of Phoenix.

Re: Eat it Grant Hill
« Reply #9 on: May 30, 2010, 11:19:46 AM »

Offline Frezz

  • Derrick White
  • Posts: 286
  • Tommy Points: 48
I don't understand this thread at all. I could understand it if he went to the Knicks or some other bottom feeder for a few more dollars. But come on now, some people need to realize that there are other places a person can go to win other than Boston. He got to game 6 of the WCF. He was on a really good team. And was a starter on that really good team.

When I saw the title of this thread I was expecting to see he made some snide remark about the Celtics or something. But telling him to "eat it" cause he chose to stay in Phoenix? Again, I'm baffled by this thread.

Re: Eat it Grant Hill
« Reply #10 on: May 30, 2010, 11:21:59 AM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
I don't understand this thread at all. I could understand it if he went to the Knicks or some other bottom feeder for a few more dollars. But come on now, some people need to realize that there are places a person go to win than Boston. He got to game 6 of the WCF. He was on a really good team. And was a starter on that really good team.

When I saw the title of this thread I was expecting to see he made some snide remark about the Celtics or something. But telling him to "eat it" cause he chose to stay in Phoenix? Again, I'm baffled by this thread.
Makes two of us. What baffles me further is that this isn't some teenager making this thread.

Re: Eat it Grant Hill
« Reply #11 on: May 30, 2010, 11:25:29 AM »

Offline fairweatherfan

  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20738
  • Tommy Points: 2365
  • Be the posts you wish to see in the world.
This thread makes no sense - a class act who went through literally years of brutal rehab despite the fact that he got paid either way, who decides to keep his family stable by staying in a city he loves, deserves to be ridiculed because he isn't wearing our preferred shade of laundry this year?

And oh yeah, a 2-time college champion who threw the best inbounds pass in NCAA history, and played his heart out at 37 in a conference finals against a much more talented team is "a born loser".  Ugh.  This just sounds mean-spirited and petty.  I hope no one ever holds the OP's accomplishments to the standards he applies to Hill.

Re: Eat it Grant Hill
« Reply #12 on: May 30, 2010, 11:26:41 AM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
This thread makes no sense - a class act who went through literally years of brutal rehab despite the fact that he got paid either way, who decides to keep his family stable by staying in a city he loves, deserves to be ridiculed because he isn't wearing our preferred shade of laundry this year?

And oh yeah, a 2-time college champion who threw the best inbounds pass in NCAA history, and played his heart out at 37 in a conference finals against a much more talented team is "a born loser".  Ugh.  This just sounds mean-spirited and petty.  I hope no one ever holds the OP's accomplishments to the standards he applies to Hill.
TP.

Re: Eat it Grant Hill
« Reply #13 on: May 30, 2010, 11:28:54 AM »

Offline soap07

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1557
  • Tommy Points: 145
Quote
So winning two national titles means he is a loser?

Not to keep harping on this, but NCAA Championships matter? The qualification for winners/losers in the NBA is mind bogglingly inconsistent. What has Hill won in the NBA?

Re: Eat it Grant Hill
« Reply #14 on: May 30, 2010, 11:33:15 AM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
Also, of course, we can't really say that Hill made the wrong decision yet, can we?  The Celts made it farther than Phoenix, but they haven't won anything other than the Eastern Conference at this point.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions