ESPN still not giving any credit to the C's

[Drucci]

Of course, we won the series, and it makes everything even funnier/sweet to see that nobody picked us to win and yet we did it and beat the Cavs. But you would have thought that after the Cavs' debacle, the media would give the Celtics some kudos and finally stop their 24/24 coverage of the Cavs to focus on the winners and the better team in this series.

But they still find ways to amaze us at ESPN because they still only talk about the Cavs and keep putting the blame on themselves instead of giving the Celtics any credit! This is so sad it's kid of funny but, I mean, can't they show some unbiased opinion after being proven wrong yet again (I thought they would have learned from last season against Orlando too but they didn't...) and acknowledge the Celtics beat the Cavs, instead of saying the Cavs didn't beat themselves?

This is getting ridiculous, look at the Daily Dime from this morning to see my point, you would almost think the Cavs advanced to the ECF (click the images to enlarge them)





"Cavaliers give away game 6"? Really Jack Ramsay? I mean, this is beyond being biased/overhyped...

The only article giving credit to the Celtics is written by Peter May, and he is a famous Boston writer...

[Roy Hobbs]

I don't expect the Celts to get any respect until we're hoisting Banner 18.  Until then, I expect us to be almost uniformly picked against in the next two series.

That's fine with me.  I like when the team plays with a chip on its collective shoulder.