We used to have a team that moved the ball, working the defense with passing, until the ball magically found someone wide open for an easy hoop.
But that was way back before Rondo was an all-star. Now, he can pound the crap out of the ball until HE finds an open guy, then pass FOR AN ASSIST/stat. Notice how many fewer passes we have per possession, compared to before Rondo was thought to be so great? We used to run a team offense based on unselfishness, but now we run the offense through Rondo, since he's so great and everything.
But let's pretend that, all of a sudden, Shuttlesworth and Paul Pierce can't score. That MUST be the problem.
No doubt. Should we also pretend that Rondo wasn't racking up the assists in November and in January when Pierce was scoring so well? Should we pretend that Ray's ups and downs come and go as Rondo gets more or fewer assists? Or should we just go all in and pretend that it's 2008 and Paul and Ray are going to carry the offense if Rondo stays out of the way?
Team ball movement depends on the team.
It doesn't matter if Rondo is getting assists or not.
If we did not have our full team out there or had a team or unit that lacked chemistry....there's just not going to be the crispness ball movement that we are accustomed to.
Add to the fact that this year's 3 point shooting is horribly down....the offense can get very stagnant when your PG is the only guy that can get to the rim.