Bill Walker looks like at best he will be an average NBA player. Average wingmen are a dime a dozen.
I do not mean to pick on you specifically, Mr. O, as other posters say this over and over again, but this statement is one of the silliest cliches in the NBA.
Who are these guys just lying around? If they're so easy to find, then why have the Cs struggled to find a reliable back-up since Posey's departure? If Walker turns out to be a guy who can get his own shot with consistency due to size, strength and speed, he won't be a guy you can just find anywhere.
To some extent you're right. However, I think Marquis Daniels is a good example of Mr. O's point. We got a wing who could start on some NBA teams and is certainly an NBA rotation player for the LLE. We likely couldn't have gotten a point guard or big man of the same quality for the LLE.
Good point...except we only got him for one year at the LLE. He's using us, hoping he looks good enough to cash in this coming summer. San Antonio got Bogans for only the minimum, but only for one year, too. Trying to get by this way works sometimes, but just as often doesn't, IMHO.
Most wings signing multi-year deals (better for team chemistry) at the $2-3 mill range almost always have something significant lacking in their game (our own guys included).
For some reason, though, when a young player has a flawed game these days, quite a few folks here have nothing good to write about him, and write him off as 100% useless, even though 1) he's playing for bottom dollar, and 2) he can improve.
Still, plenty of players with flawed games get minutes. With role players, it's not about being the best all-around player, but the one whose talents most fit.