I listened to Doc blame our loss on the "lack of energy" that our players were bringing in the second half and almost threw my remote at the television. Is he thick skulled enough to not realize that
he played Rondo for over 45 minutes of that game?? The dude was gasping for air, and had obviously lost his legs by the second half.
The commentators were talking before, during, and after the game about how Rondo was what makes this team run, and he is the reason that our slow, aging big 3 gets open shots. Well, hate to break it to ya Doc, but Rondo is still as much of a human as you or I. We bring in Nate Robinson and Marquis Daniels so that we can give Rondo a breather during big games without shooting ourselves in the foot. What do we do instead? Play Tony, Nate, and Rondo on the floor
at the same time (with short Baby at PF) against a tall and fast Cavaliers lineup! And Perk was playing excellent last night, in the meager 25 minutes that Doc gave him.
Am I saying what you think I am saying? Yes, I am. Doc is the one to blame for last night's loss. I've backed him and supported him through this whole season, turning a blind eye to his ignorance as a coach, but I can't do it anymore.
Oh, and don't bother bringing up the fact that "Pierce wasn't playing"...I'm well aware of that, and I'm well aware that we should have won that game with or without him.
Here's the box score:
http://content.usatoday.com/sportsdata/basketball/nba/game/Cavaliers_Celtics/2010/02/25There, I feel much better now that I got that off of my chest...eh, not really
