Author Topic: So, that was it? are you kidding me?  (Read 8252 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

So, that was it? are you kidding me?
« on: February 18, 2010, 03:20:17 PM »

Offline IBLEEDGREEN30

  • Xavier Tillman
  • Posts: 40
  • Tommy Points: 4
how did we improve the team?

how did we get younger athletic legs for ray allen we needed?

how did we improve with a 5'9 player?

the celts are basically trying to improve the chances of not making it out of the second round. thats awesome.

i felt this way when we traded ricky to minnesota for wally.. just stupid and dumbfounded.
"Antoine.. For The Game.. GOT IT.. OFF THE GLASS!!! WITH 1.2 ON THE CLOCK!!! THE CELTS ARE UP BY 1!!!!!... AN-TOINE WALKER BANKS IT HOME!!!!

- Mike Gorman After Antoine Walker banks in the go ahead 3 point shot off the class in Los Angeles. February 2002.

Re: So, that was it? are you kidding me?
« Reply #1 on: February 18, 2010, 03:22:10 PM »

Offline crownsy

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8469
  • Tommy Points: 157
how did we improve the team?

how did we get younger athletic legs for ray allen we needed?

how did we improve with a 5'9 player?

the celts are basically trying to improve the chances of not making it out of the second round. thats awesome.

i felt this way when we traded ricky to minnesota for wally.. just stupid and dumbfounded.

When you don't have anything that teams want to go along with your expiring contract, teams take better offers for impact players.

It even happens to Boston teams.

This is why i don't get involved in those ridiculous trade threads, it leads to unreasonable expectations.
“I will hurt you for this. A day will come when you think you’re safe and happy and your joy will turn to ashes in your mouth. And you will know the debt is paid.” – Tyrion

Re: So, that was it? are you kidding me?
« Reply #2 on: February 18, 2010, 03:23:45 PM »

Offline Onslaught

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1768
  • Tommy Points: 156
how did we improve the team?

how did we get younger athletic legs for ray allen we needed?

how did we improve with a 5'9 player?

the celts are basically trying to improve the chances of not making it out of the second round. thats awesome.

i felt this way when we traded ricky to minnesota for wally.. just stupid and dumbfounded.

When you don't have anything that teams want to go along with your expiring contract, teams take better offers for impact players.


Yep, not sure why people don't understand this.
Peace through Tyranny

Re: So, that was it? are you kidding me?
« Reply #3 on: February 18, 2010, 03:23:59 PM »

Offline pearljammer10

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13129
  • Tommy Points: 885
We needed a back up point guard...We got a back up point guard... The front office had a goal and they completed that goal... I think that is fairly successful, no?

Re: So, that was it? are you kidding me?
« Reply #4 on: February 18, 2010, 03:27:38 PM »

Offline MMacOH

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 761
  • Tommy Points: 129
Wait, so some of you never thought you were getting Amare?   :)

Although the Cavs did well this year, I now have the pleasure of listening to people talk about Lebron going to NY to pair up with another max contract guy.  Then the Knicks can sign a bunch of washed up veterans for minimum contracts (since they will be out of money). 

Re: So, that was it? are you kidding me?
« Reply #5 on: February 18, 2010, 03:27:59 PM »

Offline Prof. Clutch

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2199
  • Tommy Points: 237
  • Mind Games
I think this will be many people's first reaction, and part of me feels that way too.  But we really do have an amazing team.  We'll see how it all shakes out, but the C's could get it together and win a championship this year...that didn't change in the last 28 minutes.

Re: So, that was it? are you kidding me?
« Reply #6 on: February 18, 2010, 03:29:53 PM »

Offline ManUp

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8511
  • Tommy Points: 285
  • Rondo doesn't believe in easy buckets...
The bench wasn't a problem when they were all healthy. Daniels and House worked well together, IMO. I don't know how Daniels and Nate will do. This might actually make the team worse.

Re: So, that was it? are you kidding me?
« Reply #7 on: February 18, 2010, 03:31:48 PM »

Offline crownsy

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8469
  • Tommy Points: 157
The bench wasn't a problem when they were all healthy. Daniels and House worked well together, IMO. I don't know how Daniels and Nate will do. This might actually make the team worse.

Eddie hasn't played well enough to justify his bench role in a year and a half, and the few games he played with daniels pre thumb injury were no better.
“I will hurt you for this. A day will come when you think you’re safe and happy and your joy will turn to ashes in your mouth. And you will know the debt is paid.” – Tyrion

Re: So, that was it? are you kidding me?
« Reply #8 on: February 18, 2010, 03:32:20 PM »

Offline IBLEEDGREEN30

  • Xavier Tillman
  • Posts: 40
  • Tommy Points: 4
The bench wasn't a problem when they were all healthy. Daniels and House worked well together, IMO. I don't know how Daniels and Nate will do. This might actually make the team worse.

exactly. the bench was alright, i liked the chemistry between house and sheed and daniels when healthy. now its almost like we are forgetting how bad the starters have been and nate robinson's 5'9 dunking abilitys going to put us over the top.

cavs got jamison, a legit 20 ppg scorer, on TOP of being on a 13 game winning streak..

and we were in a huge slump, and trade away one of our best scorers and hustle players.

cool.
"Antoine.. For The Game.. GOT IT.. OFF THE GLASS!!! WITH 1.2 ON THE CLOCK!!! THE CELTS ARE UP BY 1!!!!!... AN-TOINE WALKER BANKS IT HOME!!!!

- Mike Gorman After Antoine Walker banks in the go ahead 3 point shot off the class in Los Angeles. February 2002.

Re: So, that was it? are you kidding me?
« Reply #9 on: February 18, 2010, 03:33:30 PM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32884
  • Tommy Points: 843
  • Larry Bird for President
i won't lie...i wanted to see ray, scal and giddens/walker traded for some younger pieces to help the future...but i guess we are hitched to 3 gimpy and old stars that are about out of gas for another 2.5 years. watching KG labor and get beat by guys is pretty painful....same with PP settling for long jumpers with no quickness to the hoop....and ray allen getting blown by on defense while his shot builds the Cs a brand new arena. i guess the reality is what it is.

the starters are the problem at this point. perk and the old 3 aren't getting it done

Re: So, that was it? are you kidding me?
« Reply #10 on: February 18, 2010, 03:33:46 PM »

Offline crownsy

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8469
  • Tommy Points: 157
The bench wasn't a problem when they were all healthy. Daniels and House worked well together, IMO. I don't know how Daniels and Nate will do. This might actually make the team worse.

exactly. the bench was alright, i liked the chemistry between house and sheed and daniels when healthy. now its almost like we are forgetting how bad the starters have been and nate robinson's 5'9 dunking abilitys going to put us over the top.

cavs got jamison, a legit 20 ppg scorer, on TOP of being on a 13 game winning streak..

and we were in a huge slump, and trade away one of our best scorers and hustle players.

cool.

Best scorer? one what planet?

He's a volume three shooter who can't get his own shot and has only shoot 38% over the last year and a half...I love eddie, but if he was one of our "best scorers" we should just hang it up now.
“I will hurt you for this. A day will come when you think you’re safe and happy and your joy will turn to ashes in your mouth. And you will know the debt is paid.” – Tyrion

Re: So, that was it? are you kidding me?
« Reply #11 on: February 18, 2010, 03:40:28 PM »

Offline droopdog7

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7022
  • Tommy Points: 468
Listen, there is nothing we can do short of trading for a top ten player that would significantly impact the chances of this team IF KG and PP don't improve.  So I understand not bringing in bad contracts to hurt us further in the future.

So IF KG and PP improve, bringing in Nate gets us closer.  IF they do not improve, then there was not much we could at the trading deadline except for giving up on this year entirely. 

And I am not ready to do that.

Re: So, that was it? are you kidding me?
« Reply #12 on: February 18, 2010, 03:41:17 PM »

Offline JHTruth

  • NCE
  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2297
  • Tommy Points: 111
It's what I expected. I like the move. I'm sorry if other individuals were expecting some huge move but this was solid. Every year it's the same. Rumors fly, everyone expects blockbusters at the deadline and then a series of minor trades go down. Next year it will be the same. Don't believe the hype..

Re: So, that was it? are you kidding me?
« Reply #13 on: February 18, 2010, 03:44:38 PM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123
i won't lie...i wanted to see ray, scal and giddens/walker traded for some younger pieces to help the future...but i guess we are hitched to 3 gimpy and old stars that are about out of gas for another 2.5 years. watching KG labor and get beat by guys is pretty painful....same with PP settling for long jumpers with no quickness to the hoop....and ray allen getting blown by on defense while his shot builds the Cs a brand new arena. i guess the reality is what it is.

  Why are we hitched to them? Did Danny say he's not making any trades until 2012?

Re: So, that was it? are you kidding me?
« Reply #14 on: February 18, 2010, 03:46:15 PM »

Offline boscel33

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2855
  • Tommy Points: 173
here come the 90's all over again if there was not a bigger deal made.  this team is going to get old fast, not have any room under the cap to improve, and be in a crappy draft position.  omg, how could he have not moved ray at this point? 
"There's sharks and minnows in this world. If you don't know which you are, you ain't a shark."