Author Topic: Celtics (32-18) at Kings (18-34) 2/16  (Read 98558 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (32-18) at Kings (18-34) 2/16
« Reply #315 on: February 16, 2010, 11:48:34 PM »

Offline fairweatherfan

  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20738
  • Tommy Points: 2365
  • Be the posts you wish to see in the world.
nice PP.....nice

why was that offensive? wasn't may in the circle?
Kings guy said that if you catch it in the circle, it can be a charge, but it looks like Pierce drove into the circle. I think they got the call wrong.

The rule is if you catch it on the block the circle doesn't matter.  Prevents stuff like old-school Shaq bulldozing everyone in the paint.

Re: Celtics (32-18) at Kings (18-34) 2/16
« Reply #316 on: February 16, 2010, 11:48:59 PM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32877
  • Tommy Points: 843
  • Larry Bird for President
how can rondo make 3 after 3 in that horse contest but miss FTs?

how can KG make 3 after 3 in practice but not make them when he takes them in games?

hitting shots in practice and hitting them in a game are two very different things...you have to be on a whole other level to hit shots consistently in a game.

it is a FT with nobody on you....i dont get it

Re: Celtics (32-18) at Kings (18-34) 2/16
« Reply #317 on: February 16, 2010, 11:49:03 PM »

Offline Evantime34

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11942
  • Tommy Points: 764
  • Eagerly Awaiting the Next Fantasy Draft
Also agree that it's not that Garnett can't jump anymore--I just saw him go up for a rebound pretty well.  It's the quick lift and explosion that is gone right now.  I was hoping it'd come back (like it was earlier this season).  But it might be gone for good...which would really be a shame. 

If we could make layups we'd be up about 15 right now.
If anyone can work hard enough to regain their vertical after an Injury it will be Kg... next season.
DKC:  Rockets
CB Draft: Memphis Grizz
Players: Klay Thompson, Jabari Parker, Aaron Gordon
Next 3 picks: 4.14, 4.15, 4.19

Re: Celtics (32-18) at Kings (18-34) 2/16
« Reply #318 on: February 16, 2010, 11:49:14 PM »

Offline MF Doom

  • Brad Stevens
  • Posts: 212
  • Tommy Points: 29
http://www.bostonherald.com/sports/basketball/celtics/view/20100216sources_celtics_eye_knicks_nate_robinson/srvc=home&position=recent

just incase anyone hasnt seen that in the other thread. Looks like we are close to a deal with NY

Re: Celtics (32-18) at Kings (18-34) 2/16
« Reply #319 on: February 16, 2010, 11:49:56 PM »

Offline jadams5214

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1021
  • Tommy Points: 82
Well the starters came out in this 3rd quarter and did nothing other than hang onto a slim lead.

They came off a nice break and all talked about getting back to Celtic basketball.  Yet so far nothing has changed.  The starters can't finish on the break, are slow defensively and are just lumbering around.  The Kings are a terrible team but are staying right with the Celtics starters easily.

The expectations have become so low for this team that it's considered a positive that they haven't blown their halftime lead yet against a terrible team and after having time to regroup and get motivated...

Re: Celtics (32-18) at Kings (18-34) 2/16
« Reply #320 on: February 16, 2010, 11:50:54 PM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32877
  • Tommy Points: 843
  • Larry Bird for President
more missed FTs.....

Re: Celtics (32-18) at Kings (18-34) 2/16
« Reply #321 on: February 16, 2010, 11:51:22 PM »

Offline jadams5214

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1021
  • Tommy Points: 82
And another blown layup this time by Daniels.  Just keep adding to the list geez

Re: Celtics (32-18) at Kings (18-34) 2/16
« Reply #322 on: February 16, 2010, 11:51:26 PM »

Offline PosImpos

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12383
  • Tommy Points: 903
  • Rondo = Good
I just noticed the Thunder now have 31 wins.  That's right.  In a short time (5-6 games) a team that won fewer than 30 games last year could have a better record than us.
Never forget the Champs of '08, or the gutsy warriors of '10.

"I know you all wanna win, but you gotta do it TOGETHER!"
- Doc Rivers

Re: Celtics (32-18) at Kings (18-34) 2/16
« Reply #323 on: February 16, 2010, 11:51:57 PM »

Offline PLamb

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1569
  • Tommy Points: 1
Doc had better put these guys through a three hour layup drill and if they miss one they have to do suicides

This is getting almost comical with the missed layups
Pick 2 Knicks

PG: George Hill, Ty Lawson
SG: Ray Allen, Anthony Parker, Quentin Richardson
SF: Grant Hill, Matt Barnes, D
PF: Zach Randolph, Kenyon Martin, Jon Brockman, Dante Cunningham
C:  Nene Hilario,   Own rights: Nikola Pekovic IR: Kyle Weaver

Re: Celtics (32-18) at Kings (18-34) 2/16
« Reply #324 on: February 16, 2010, 11:52:12 PM »

Offline perks-a-beast

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2608
  • Tommy Points: 269
ray  ::)

Re: Celtics (32-18) at Kings (18-34) 2/16
« Reply #325 on: February 16, 2010, 11:52:24 PM »

Offline jdpapa3

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3884
  • Tommy Points: 85
Greene just threw a bow at KG. Should've been t'd up.

Re: Celtics (32-18) at Kings (18-34) 2/16
« Reply #326 on: February 16, 2010, 11:52:32 PM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
ray is 4-11 tonight. the offense just not flowing for the starters, but at leat they are holding the lead.

Re: Celtics (32-18) at Kings (18-34) 2/16
« Reply #327 on: February 16, 2010, 11:52:39 PM »

Offline Kuberski33

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7375
  • Tommy Points: 570
At least they're hustling and trying to uptempo.  Big change from the 3Q of recent games....

Re: Celtics (32-18) at Kings (18-34) 2/16
« Reply #328 on: February 16, 2010, 11:52:57 PM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32877
  • Tommy Points: 843
  • Larry Bird for President
I just noticed the Thunder now have 31 wins.  That's right.  In a short time (5-6 games) a team that won fewer than 30 games last year could have a better record than us.

reality of how average this team really is

Re: Celtics (32-18) at Kings (18-34) 2/16
« Reply #329 on: February 16, 2010, 11:53:44 PM »

Offline ejk3489

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2233
  • Tommy Points: 215
I just noticed the Thunder now have 31 wins.  That's right.  In a short time (5-6 games) a team that won fewer than 30 games last year could have a better record than us.

reality of how average this team really is

Or maybe OKC is just that good?