Author Topic: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29  (Read 128080 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #540 on: January 29, 2010, 10:00:09 PM »

Offline Casperian

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3501
  • Tommy Points: 545
veteran move by Ray
In the summer of 2017, I predicted this team would not win a championship for the next 10 years.

3 down, 7 to go.

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #541 on: January 29, 2010, 10:00:12 PM »

Offline jdpapa3

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3884
  • Tommy Points: 85
Doc is clueless when it comes to timeouts in mid-play. Most other coaches in the league could see that play was broken. Thanks for the 5 point swing doc.

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #542 on: January 29, 2010, 10:00:19 PM »

Offline ejk3489

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2233
  • Tommy Points: 215
Wowwwww.

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #543 on: January 29, 2010, 10:00:30 PM »

Offline jimmehx

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1257
  • Tommy Points: 166
KG is really having a bad night. Bad back-to-back.

He has shut down Smith.

And conner: it was Marvin Williams.

How does he have a near double-double if he has been so aptly shut down?


"Uhhh... Wife makes chicken..." - Brian Scalabrine 2007.

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #544 on: January 29, 2010, 10:00:39 PM »

Offline Change

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6666
  • Tommy Points: 544
Game.

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #545 on: January 29, 2010, 10:00:47 PM »

Offline Drucci

  • Global Moderator
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7223
  • Tommy Points: 439
I was telling you in the first half Crawford would get that call in the 4th... pathetic.

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #546 on: January 29, 2010, 10:00:52 PM »

Offline xmuscularghandix

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7620
  • Tommy Points: 280
This bench needs Marquis back, and it needs a low post presence that WANTS to be down there.

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #547 on: January 29, 2010, 10:00:57 PM »

Offline Rida

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 765
  • Tommy Points: 86
How costly is that fumbled out of bound rebound between sheed and house looking now

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #548 on: January 29, 2010, 10:01:03 PM »

Offline MattG12

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3638
  • Tommy Points: 997
  • PEACE
I know you guys are gonna kill me for this but we have no chance at winning a championship if we dont trade Rays contract for some help.

Who are we going to trade for that is going to get us closer to a championship?

Butler, Boozer,  Igoudala, Amare, Ellis, Jamison and all the other people on the trading block

If you get Amare, would you then turn and trade KG for a young healthy 2?

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #549 on: January 29, 2010, 10:01:09 PM »

Offline Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21257
  • Tommy Points: 2451
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #550 on: January 29, 2010, 10:01:20 PM »

Offline Andy Jick

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3795
  • Tommy Points: 89
  • You know my methods, Watson.
so NOW they go down low?  too late, doc.
"It was easier to know it than to explain why I know it."

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #551 on: January 29, 2010, 10:01:30 PM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
This one is over. That's 2-7 against the top teams in the east. Face it guys, The Hawks are a better team. Another good two quarter effort from the Celtics tonight and another really bad night on the offensive end. This fourth quarter, the offense has been horrendous. But hey, it's only January.

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #552 on: January 29, 2010, 10:01:37 PM »

Offline Bankshot

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7540
  • Tommy Points: 632
Why is Wallace in the game instead of Perk?
"If somebody would have told you when he was playing with the Knicks that Nate Robinson was going to change a big time game and he was going to do it mostly because of his defense, somebody would have got slapped."  Mark Jackson

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #553 on: January 29, 2010, 10:01:45 PM »

Offline JohnBagleyValueMeal

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 813
  • Tommy Points: 176
  • It's not hard to work hard.
the hawks are young, athletic, great 1v1, and they deserve to be winning right now

but i'll be [dang]ed if they don't get more junk to fall than any team in the league.
McHale's favorite ruse is putting paper in the mouths of sleeping teammates. "Try using one of these cocktail napkins," he said. "When just the edge sticks out of a guy's mouth, it looks like he's got fangs. The best part is when he wakes up."
-- Sports Illustrated, 12/19/1983

Re: Celtics (29-14) at Hawks (29-14) 1/29
« Reply #554 on: January 29, 2010, 10:01:51 PM »

Offline jdpapa3

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3884
  • Tommy Points: 85
KG is really having a bad night. Bad back-to-back.

He has shut down Smith.

And conner: it was Marvin Williams.

How does he have a near double-double if he has been so aptly shut down?

He's 11 and 9 and 6 of those have been in transition.