Author Topic: Nate Robinson trade rumor : very unlikely to happen  (Read 44739 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32935
  • Tommy Points: 846
  • Larry Bird for President
I guess we'll find out tonight. Eddie House plays = no trade.

i dont think that means anything...the deal might go through later...eddie playing tonight means nothing really...hopefully he makes a case to stick around

Offline PosImpos

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12383
  • Tommy Points: 903
  • Rondo = Good
I guess we'll find out tonight. Eddie House plays = no trade.

i dont think that means anything...the deal might go through later...eddie playing tonight means nothing really...hopefully he makes a case to stick around

A case to stick around would mean he scores 40 points and throws down a couple nice dunks, maybe gets a block or two.

You see that happening?
Never forget the Champs of '08, or the gutsy warriors of '10.

"I know you all wanna win, but you gotta do it TOGETHER!"
- Doc Rivers

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32935
  • Tommy Points: 846
  • Larry Bird for President
I guess we'll find out tonight. Eddie House plays = no trade.

i dont think that means anything...the deal might go through later...eddie playing tonight means nothing really...hopefully he makes a case to stick around

A case to stick around would mean he scores 40 points and throws down a couple nice dunks, maybe gets a block or two.

You see that happening?

brother...i would take 10 points of the bench from him at this point  :)

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34127
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
I guess we'll find out tonight. Eddie House plays = no trade.

i dont think that means anything...the deal might go through later...eddie playing tonight means nothing really...hopefully he makes a case to stick around

So, should I be worried if KG doesn't play?

Offline ssspence

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6375
  • Tommy Points: 403
I guess we'll find out tonight. Eddie House plays = no trade.

i dont think that means anything...the deal might go through later...eddie playing tonight means nothing really...hopefully he makes a case to stick around

A case to stick around would mean he scores 40 points and throws down a couple nice dunks, maybe gets a block or two.

You see that happening?

brother...i would take 10 points of the bench from him at this point  :)

amen
Mike

(My name is not Mike)

Online Atzar

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10488
  • Tommy Points: 1925
I guess we'll find out tonight. Eddie House plays = no trade.

i dont think that means anything...the deal might go through later...eddie playing tonight means nothing really...hopefully he makes a case to stick around

A case to stick around would mean he scores 40 points and throws down a couple nice dunks, maybe gets a block or two.

You see that happening?

brother...i would take 10 points of the bench from him at this point  :)

amen

Has Eddie ever dunked?  Somehow, I just can't picture that.

Offline Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21271
  • Tommy Points: 2452
I guess we'll find out tonight. Eddie House plays = no trade.

i dont think that means anything...the deal might go through later...eddie playing tonight means nothing really...hopefully he makes a case to stick around

So, should I be worried if KG doesn't play?

I remember Billups sitting the night before the Kenny Anderson trade. If this trade is that close, I could see it happening.
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird

Offline More Banners

  • Al Horford
  • ***
  • Posts: 3845
  • Tommy Points: 257
Anything to end the Eddie House Experiment.

Anything.

Offline JIMTONIK

  • Hugo Gonzalez
  • Posts: 61
  • Tommy Points: 4
If we see the statistics, Nate is averaging better numbers than House. In EVERYTHING. He got better number also in 3pt shots.
So I hope this trade will be done.
"Prima mi faccio, poi vi dico"

Offline Rondo_is_better

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2821
  • Tommy Points: 495
  • R.I.P. Nate Dogg
If this happens I'm sad to see Eddie go... but Robinson is a better player - I'm pretty sure.
Grab a few boards, keep the TO's under 14, close out on shooters and we'll win.

Offline CbrewEra

  • Derrick White
  • Posts: 421
  • Tommy Points: 37
  • LETS GO BOSTON
A this point is pretty sentimental and novelty ish to the team it seems.  Hard to get rid of a great guy like that, but when it comes down to it, Nate is better in almost all areas.  Eddie is the definition of streaky, and championship teams (and the Celtics with how they're playing) need consistency.
"He trades like a drunk Texas oilman trying to impress a beautiful woman"

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32935
  • Tommy Points: 846
  • Larry Bird for President
would love to get something with nate  to help the bench

Offline JIMTONIK

  • Hugo Gonzalez
  • Posts: 61
  • Tommy Points: 4
Eddie
FG .394
FG 3pt .371
ppg 7.3


Nate
FG .474
FG 3pt .388
ppg 13.0
"Prima mi faccio, poi vi dico"

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32935
  • Tommy Points: 846
  • Larry Bird for President
no doubt nate is an upgrade over eddie...and i wouldnt be opposed at getting jeffries with him...could really fill a need

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32935
  • Tommy Points: 846
  • Larry Bird for President
latest from the globe:

On Nate Robinson and the Celtics
Link|Comments ()Posted by Gary Dzen, Boston.com Staff January 20, 2010 05:20 PM
Here's what we know:

The Celtics have made an offer to the Knicks for guard Nate Robinson, this according to Yahoo! Sports (and former Boston Globe) NBA writer Marc J. Spears. Spears made this revelation during an interview with Tanguay and Zolak on 98.5 The Sports Hub yesterday.

Marc tends to break these things, and he's as reliable a source on the NBA as there is. But what he wasn't doing yesterday was making any proclamations that a deal is imminent. In fact, Spears technically "broke" this story in a column he wrote last Friday for Yahoo!. Even Spears himself seemed surprised the story was getting the attention it got yesterday and today, tweeting the link to the story this afternoon. He writes:

The Boston Celtics and the Los Angeles Lakers are among the teams who have expressed some interest in New York Knicks guard Nate Robinson(notes), league sources said. Robinson’s base-year status, however, makes it difficult for any trade and the Knicks are said to be reluctant to ship Robinson to an Eastern Conference team, further complicating the Celtics’ efforts to land him.
The Memphis Grizzlies also have shown interest in Robinson, but the feeling, for now, isn’t mutual. Robinson can veto any trade and doesn’t appear eager to move to Memphis.

So we know the Celtics have kicked the tires on Robinson, which is definitely interesting considering his issues with the Knicks this season. Robinson was benched for a month because of a disagreement with coach Mike D'Antoni but came back to score 42 points against the Hawks on New Years Day. Robinson also has a very reasonable salary, one-year at $ 4 million, making him attractive to other teams if indeed he is on the block.

Here's what else we know: According to the New York Daily News, Doc Rivers wouldn't mind getting the chance to coach Robinson.

"Doc thinks he can connect with anybody," a source close to Rivers told the News.

But we also know Rivers is a player's coach, and he probably really could coach anybody. As for details, such as the players sent to the Knicks, and when or if the deal may happen.

We don't know.