Author Topic: Celtics (26-10) at Nets (3-34) 1/13  (Read 60849 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (26-10) at Nets (3-34) 1/13
« Reply #240 on: January 13, 2010, 09:50:11 PM »

Offline KCattheStripe

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10726
  • Tommy Points: 830
hate hate hate, hatey hate hate. I love to hate in blowout gamethreads.



Hate Hate.

Re: Celtics (26-10) at Nets (3-34) 1/13
« Reply #241 on: January 13, 2010, 09:50:42 PM »

Offline Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21259
  • Tommy Points: 2451
Billy does look chunky. I hope it's just muscle.
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird

Re: Celtics (26-10) at Nets (3-34) 1/13
« Reply #242 on: January 13, 2010, 09:51:43 PM »

Offline Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21259
  • Tommy Points: 2451
Humphries is a no talent goon.
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird

Re: Celtics (26-10) at Nets (3-34) 1/13
« Reply #243 on: January 13, 2010, 09:52:24 PM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32883
  • Tommy Points: 843
  • Larry Bird for President
TPs to all..

Re: Celtics (26-10) at Nets (3-34) 1/13
« Reply #244 on: January 13, 2010, 09:53:16 PM »

Offline fairweatherfan

  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20738
  • Tommy Points: 2365
  • Be the posts you wish to see in the world.
Now why is that not a flagrant if Baby's hit was?  Because Baby didn't go down?  Don't get it.

Re: Celtics (26-10) at Nets (3-34) 1/13
« Reply #245 on: January 13, 2010, 09:54:11 PM »

Offline jadams5214

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1021
  • Tommy Points: 82
You guys are negative about a game that was in garbage time after the first half?

Typical game thread as of late, it seems like.
I just got home so when I saw the boxscore I expected a tp lovefest, that's all.

As a matter of fact Bill Walker just got in, tps all around lol!

Still confusing pointing out things to work on and logical criticism with negativity.  Using that logic Doc and the guys will be talking about how great everything was tonight and that there is nothing else to work on.  Scal and House aren't in horrid shooting slumps right now either.

It is OK to talk about things the C's need to work on, in fact that is what keen observers that are also fans actually do.

Re: Celtics (26-10) at Nets (3-34) 1/13
« Reply #246 on: January 13, 2010, 09:55:47 PM »

Kiorrik

  • Guest
You guys are negative about a game that was in garbage time after the first half?

Typical game thread as of late, it seems like.
I just got home so when I saw the boxscore I expected a tp lovefest, that's all.

As a matter of fact Bill Walker just got in, tps all around lol!

Still confusing pointing out things to work on and logical criticism with negativity.  Using that logic Doc and the guys will be talking about how great everything was tonight and that there is nothing else to work on.  Scal and House aren't in horrid shooting slumps right now either.

It is OK to talk about things the C's need to work on, in fact that is what keen observers that are also fans actually do.
You don't generally work on positive things :p

So erm, not much actual Walker action in this game.

Re: Celtics (26-10) at Nets (3-34) 1/13
« Reply #247 on: January 13, 2010, 09:56:31 PM »

Offline Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21259
  • Tommy Points: 2451
You guys are negative about a game that was in garbage time after the first half?

Typical game thread as of late, it seems like.
I just got home so when I saw the boxscore I expected a tp lovefest, that's all.

As a matter of fact Bill Walker just got in, tps all around lol!

Still confusing pointing out things to work on and logical criticism with negativity.  Using that logic Doc and the guys will be talking about how great everything was tonight and that there is nothing else to work on.  Scal and House aren't in horrid shooting slumps right now either.

It is OK to talk about things the C's need to work on, in fact that is what keen observers that are also fans actually do.

I enjoy your insights. :)
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird

Re: Celtics (26-10) at Nets (3-34) 1/13
« Reply #248 on: January 13, 2010, 09:56:46 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
Sure hope the Lakers lose tonight.  Gasol is out, Kobe has played only 11 minutes and taken one shot and the Lakers are leading the Mavs in Dallas on the second night of a back to back.  

So many C's fans have used injuries and fatigue as excuses this year --- a Laker win tonight would give them lots of ammunition to refute those claims.  Mavs will hopefully dominate the 2nd half.
How would that be ammunition? The Celtics are 5-2 in the second game of back to backs. The Lakers are 6-3. (not counting tonights game)

Re: Celtics (26-10) at Nets (3-34) 1/13
« Reply #249 on: January 13, 2010, 09:57:16 PM »

Kiorrik

  • Guest
JEEZ this game is SLOW.

Re: Celtics (26-10) at Nets (3-34) 1/13
« Reply #250 on: January 13, 2010, 09:57:18 PM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
You guys are negative about a game that was in garbage time after the first half?

Typical game thread as of late, it seems like.
I just got home so when I saw the boxscore I expected a tp lovefest, that's all.

As a matter of fact Bill Walker just got in, tps all around lol!

Still confusing pointing out things to work on and logical criticism with negativity.  Using that logic Doc and the guys will be talking about how great everything was tonight and that there is nothing else to work on.  Scal and House aren't in horrid shooting slumps right now either.

It is OK to talk about things the C's need to work on, in fact that is what keen observers that are also fans actually do.

When 90% of one's commentary is based upon criticisms, even in a 30 point blowout, I think it's fair to suggest that certain posters have a glass-half-empty philosophy.

To each their own, of course.  I just don't think there's anything wrong with pointing out the reality of the situation.  Isn't that the realist talking point of the week?

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: Celtics (26-10) at Nets (3-34) 1/13
« Reply #251 on: January 13, 2010, 09:59:01 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
You guys are negative about a game that was in garbage time after the first half?

Typical game thread as of late, it seems like.
I just got home so when I saw the boxscore I expected a tp lovefest, that's all.

As a matter of fact Bill Walker just got in, tps all around lol!

Still confusing pointing out things to work on and logical criticism with negativity.  Using that logic Doc and the guys will be talking about how great everything was tonight and that there is nothing else to work on.  Scal and House aren't in horrid shooting slumps right now either.

It is OK to talk about things the C's need to work on, in fact that is what keen observers that are also fans actually do.

When 90% of one's commentary is based upon criticisms, even in a 30 point blowout, I think it's fair to suggest that certain posters have a glass-half-empty philosophy.

To each their own, of course.  I just don't think there's anything wrong with pointing out the reality of the situation.  Isn't that the realist talking point of the week?
I wasn't even singling out you jadams5214. There were a lot of "uh ohs" after the Celtics gave up a quick 10 points of the lead.

Re: Celtics (26-10) at Nets (3-34) 1/13
« Reply #252 on: January 13, 2010, 09:59:34 PM »

Offline ManUp

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8511
  • Tommy Points: 285
  • Rondo doesn't believe in easy buckets...
I looked down this time :(

Re: Celtics (26-10) at Nets (3-34) 1/13
« Reply #253 on: January 13, 2010, 10:00:05 PM »

Offline rondohondo

  • NCE
  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10764
  • Tommy Points: 1196
Billy!!

Re: Celtics (26-10) at Nets (3-34) 1/13
« Reply #254 on: January 13, 2010, 10:00:08 PM »

Offline Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21259
  • Tommy Points: 2451
Billy does look chunky. I hope it's just muscle.

Is there any way we can get our suspected overweights (Scals, Baby, and Walker) to take their shirts off? I just want to know that my eyes are not fooling me.






Billy!!!!!!!!!! You're not fat, you're phat!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird