I still see a minor move or two at the end of the bench.
You know, that under the radar that can make a big difference in the playoffs that no one pays attention to at the deadline.
I tend to agree with this. A trade is going to be somewhat tough. I don't want to trade Ray for a variety of reasons. Scal and Tony could maybe fetch something; however, can they nab someone who can really crack a playoff rotation of our starters plus Wallace, Daniels, Davis, and House? And if such a trade can't nab someone who breaks that playoff rotation, is it really worth bringing in a new face to be the 10th or 11th man or are we better off with two guys who know the system?
With this down economy it would seem there would be some buy-outs and teams wanting expiring contracts. Hoping we can trade some combination of Scal, Giddens, Sheldon, Walker and a draft pick for something that could help us this year. I don't see those 4 players putting over-the-top for a championship.
Not saying I disagree with that; however, I do think that some people are overly eager to improve what (when healthy) are our 10th, 11th, 12th, and in some cases IR guys. I agree that depth is nice, but come playoff time, unless the "new guy" can beat out Wallace, Daniels, Davis, and House, he isn't likely to make much of a difference unless there's an injury.
While you could certainly argue that another wing or another PG would be nice, in the case of the wing, I might be more content with Tony Allen right now than what some might perceive to be a marginal upgrade. At least with Tony we know that he'll be content riding the pine, knows the plays, and has a chemistry with the players. Will another bench player who is used to playing be content with that?
Now if there's an undeniable talent upgrade out there, I'm all about it. I'm just not sold that upgrading the very end of our bench is all that important.