Author Topic: Decision Time on Hudson  (Read 6326 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Decision Time on Hudson
« on: January 03, 2010, 11:16:31 AM »

Offline jdpapa3

  • Al Horford
  • ***
  • Posts: 3884
  • Tommy Points: 85
Contracts become guaranteed next week. * I think it is January 10th.

You have to think they will keep Hudson if they believe they will do a 2 for 1 trade w/Scal/whoever, but Danny has liked the 15th spot flexibility in the past.

I'd prefer to keep him because I love his offense and defense. Still needs work on pg skills, but he got it upcourt on Marcus Banks and Banks' only skills I can remember are pressure defense in the backcourt and speed so that impressed me.

Players seem to like him and Rondo credits him with helping his game out in practice.

Re: Decision Time on Hudson
« Reply #1 on: January 03, 2010, 11:18:53 AM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34127
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
I would not be surprised to see him gone and replaced by Lou.

Re: Decision Time on Hudson
« Reply #2 on: January 03, 2010, 11:43:13 AM »

Offline hwangjini_1

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18378
  • Tommy Points: 2764
  • bammokja
actually, if lue is brought on board i dont think it will be hudson he replaces. hudson is showing he can become a good back up pg for the celtics in the next year or so.

walker and giddens have not proven much aside from athleticism. it seems that the skills walker and giddens bring, and the shortcomings they also bring, make them less valuable to the celtics than hudson.
I believe Gandhi is the only person who knew about real democracy — not democracy as the right to go and buy what you want, but democracy as the responsibility to be accountable to everyone around you. Democracy begins with freedom from hunger, freedom from unemployment, freedom from fear, and freedom from hatred.
- Vandana Shiva

Re: Decision Time on Hudson
« Reply #3 on: January 03, 2010, 11:45:07 AM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
actually, if lue is brought on board i dont think it will be hudson he replaces. hudson is showing he can become a good back up pg for the celtics in the next year or so.

walker and giddens have not proven much aside from athleticism. it seems that the skills walker and giddens bring, and the shortcomings they also bring, make them less valuable to the celtics than hudson.
But that would cost the Celtics significantly more money than cutting Hudson. Is the difference between Hudson and them worth that to the C's?

Re: Decision Time on Hudson
« Reply #4 on: January 03, 2010, 11:48:49 AM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34127
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
actually, if lue is brought on board i dont think it will be hudson he replaces. hudson is showing he can become a good back up pg for the celtics in the next year or so.

walker and giddens have not proven much aside from athleticism. it seems that the skills walker and giddens bring, and the shortcomings they also bring, make them less valuable to the celtics than hudson.
But that would cost the Celtics significantly more money than cutting Hudson. Is the difference between Hudson and them worth that to the C's?


And what would be the point?  So he can be the 4th little guy on the Celtics?

Re: Decision Time on Hudson
« Reply #5 on: January 03, 2010, 11:51:06 AM »

Offline Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21271
  • Tommy Points: 2452
I've liked what I've seen. The kid could become the next Darrell Armstrong.
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird

Re: Decision Time on Hudson
« Reply #6 on: January 03, 2010, 11:55:03 AM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34127
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
I've liked what I've seen. The kid could become the next Darrell Armstrong.


Or the next Gabe Pruitt/Allen Ray.

Re: Decision Time on Hudson
« Reply #7 on: January 03, 2010, 12:00:34 PM »

Offline Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21271
  • Tommy Points: 2452
I've liked what I've seen. The kid could become the next Darrell Armstrong.


Or the next Gabe Pruitt/Allen Ray.

The difference is that Hudson is a scoring pg and Pruitt/Ray were scorers forced to play pg.
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird

Re: Decision Time on Hudson
« Reply #8 on: January 03, 2010, 12:10:06 PM »

Offline moiso

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7691
  • Tommy Points: 447
Hudson can play.  He may never find the open man but he can score and play defense.  He has a confidence that Allen Ray and Gabe Pruitt never had.  We had some discussion about Nate Robinson recently.  Hudson can do some Nate Robinson type scoring if he had a green light.  He'll never be a true pg but the guy can score.  He appears to be the best prospect out of the Giddens/Walker group.  And I'd rather play Hudson than Lue, who appeared to be washed up a couple years ago.

Re: Decision Time on Hudson
« Reply #9 on: January 03, 2010, 12:28:17 PM »

Offline Drucci

  • Global Moderator
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7223
  • Tommy Points: 439
I like what I've seen from Hudson last night. It was just one game though so I won't get overly excited but he sure can score, he defends pretty well (and fights well through screens) and brings a lot of good energy.

I thought his passes were a little too "shaky", maybe due to nervosity. I think he deserves to stay on this roster and he deserves to get more playing time, especially during this period when our team is depleted.

Re: Decision Time on Hudson
« Reply #10 on: January 03, 2010, 12:36:57 PM »

Offline Bankshot

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7540
  • Tommy Points: 632
I like what I've seen from Hudson last night. It was just one game though so I won't get overly excited but he sure can score, he defends pretty well (and fights well through screens) and brings a lot of good energy.

I thought his passes were a little too "shaky", maybe due to nervosity. I think he deserves to stay on this roster and he deserves to get more playing time, especially during this period when our team is depleted.
"If somebody would have told you when he was playing with the Knicks that Nate Robinson was going to change a big time game and he was going to do it mostly because of his defense, somebody would have got slapped."  Mark Jackson

Re: Decision Time on Hudson
« Reply #11 on: January 03, 2010, 12:39:16 PM »

Online Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 53423
  • Tommy Points: 2578
Hudson is worth keeping. He's a decent prospect.

I would only be interested in waiving him if it meant a rotation caliber player was taking his place. Otherwise, I don't see the point. Since that isn't on the table at the moment ... I see no point in waiving in Hudson.

Re: Decision Time on Hudson
« Reply #12 on: January 03, 2010, 12:42:05 PM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34127
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
I just don't see it.


What I did see was when the starting PG was out, the Celtics start three SGs.  



The Celtics need that spot filled with a player that can step in and play when Rondo is out.  

Re: Decision Time on Hudson
« Reply #13 on: January 03, 2010, 12:50:23 PM »

Offline scoop

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 663
  • Tommy Points: 74
I'd rather have a better defensive player than Hudson, but he seems decent enough to fill the 3rd string PG spot. He's under the cheapest contract, so if the open roster spot is needed it's not too costly to release him anyway.

Re: Decision Time on Hudson
« Reply #14 on: January 03, 2010, 12:51:07 PM »

Online Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 53423
  • Tommy Points: 2578
I just don't see it.


What I did see was when the starting PG was out, the Celtics start three SGs.  



The Celtics need that spot filled with a player that can step in and play when Rondo is out.  
How many third string point guards can actually do that?